Re: v2 of valgrind based memory tests

diff --git a/53/131f3a1afd15713a3b03f48901230e989e8dfa b/53/131f3a1afd15713a3b03f48901230e989e8dfa
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f63e1d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/53/131f3a1afd15713a3b03f48901230e989e8dfa
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A10A431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:17:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 7xwFX+GWEGVz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:17:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F4D431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:17:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1TnUNN-0001Rq-74; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:17:02 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1TnUNF-0004xY-95; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:16:49 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: v2 of valgrind based memory tests\r
+In-Reply-To: <87obhild1r.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>\r
+References: <1356361160-6449-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+       <87obhild1r.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+213~g4af1ac6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:16:49 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87sj6ue0fy.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:17:07 -0000\r
+\r
+Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, david@tethera.net wrote:\r
+>\r
+> LGTM.  In the long run, I wonder if we want to separate the time and\r
+> memory tests like this or if some tests would make sense in either mode.\r
+\r
+pushed. At the moment, the split into time versus memory tests is a\r
+simple way to separate out "heavy weight" tests, but this could be done\r
+more explicitely.\r
+\r
+d\r