Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID

diff --git a/36/625548bc27b7a632a4f475a74b025aa618ac06 b/36/625548bc27b7a632a4f475a74b025aa618ac06
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8a8ab18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36/625548bc27b7a632a4f475a74b025aa618ac06
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Return-Path: <notmuch@equaeghe.nospammail.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CF26DE140C\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:45:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.668\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053,\r
+  DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 48T6wt_8sy0V for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:45:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com\r
+ [66.111.4.28])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22B686DE0C66\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:45:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42])\r
+ by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278520214\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:45:52 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])\r
+ by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:45:52 -0500\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nospammail.net; h=\r
+ content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to\r
+ :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc\r
+ :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=8mNiB4QbBc1LdY63YGWan2v8aNo=; b=No2kFU\r
+ 3NAM7jTx6ngRTl/GL5LwgQIeFz/jtYDpJ0LR1vSfdOhZXro0JYHjyB+XBceonBGo\r
+ ByQjbUIVFLMEvy21DM9vatOrVp0JOmwnxzyiFiCgAz1eWpQOMlLGo16NP5VCtcNZ\r
+ JPRIX+bhmgJ5wlh4IPvuF/6ryGn6Y/SZ8jEIQ=\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=\r
+ messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type\r
+ :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references\r
+ :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=8mNiB4QbBc1LdY6\r
+ 3YGWan2v8aNo=; b=p6JmCdWqYhuITAgL26PbzEuCvMxrZghHKR6/8hA4x/H9ygY\r
+ ZXzMvGLNCIQp1gVOxMhJ4i5S34++vl53JzeNTDW7okohVx0aIeSv34W/G/TaHqG8\r
+ jqR6HvI8FTyGI9lJ2d4Dh/N8pLJrQZ7GQvDmU44BsD12nYGBruBPt+UHb+b4=\r
+X-Sasl-enc: CWzHu6H+b47jIe+d9ilPwVmN6nFUra8PKu+ghvKqd1Ru 1452455151\r
+Received: from sysoppad.localnet (cust-5286ecc8.wba.access.stipte.nl\r
+ [82.134.236.200])\r
+ by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E8295C00017\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:45:51 -0500 (EST)\r
+From: Erik Quaeghebeur <notmuch@equaeghe.nospammail.net>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID\r
+Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 20:45:49 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <1797484.KB5JPIe8ts@sysoppad>\r
+User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.1.12-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2a8odcsvx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad> <m2a8odcsvx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:45:58 -0000\r
+\r
+Thanks, Tomi, for your quick response.\r
+\r
+> > * If yes, for resent messages\r
+> > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.6), does notmuch use\r
+> > (the chronologically last) Resent-Message-ID, or the Message-ID?\r
+> \r
+> the Message-ID\r
+\r
+Hmm. Is this a conscious decision, or is the resending case just not taken into account?\r
+\r
+What happens if I have both a message and my own copy of it after resending it to somebody else? I would like to have a record of whom I resent it to, as with forwarded messages (where the forwarded message does have a different message id). \r
+\r
+Are the Resent-* headers of the resent message merged into the database entry? I guess this last question is more general: with multiple messages with the same Message-ID but differences (for whatever reason), how will these messages be merged in the database?\r
+\r
+\r
+Best,\r
+\r
+Erik\r