--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448246DE1226\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 04:03:18 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.308\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.243,\r
+ RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id ZtQeOPYGV6WU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 3 Feb 2016 04:03:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0273B6DE01FF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 04:03:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1aQw8k-0004fc-19; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 07:02:30 -0500\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 8782 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:03:08 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jan Pobrislo <ccx@webprojekty.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Maildir custom flags and notmuch tags\r
+In-Reply-To: <20160202175220.12f8a712@dorje.v103.te2000>\r
+References: <1448504191-30974-1-git-send-email-igor.contato@gmail.com>\r
+ <87mvsd7cxr.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160202175220.12f8a712@dorje.v103.te2000>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 08:03:08 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87d1se9f2b.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:03:18 -0000\r
+\r
+Jan Pobrislo <ccx@webprojekty.cz> writes:\r
+>\r
+> I think that using fixed mapping for flag meaning is a good POC step,\r
+> but that won't work without explicit support from the synchronizer to\r
+> map specific keywords to always same tags. I don't really know what\r
+> offlineimap does to synchronize keywords, if anything. Dsync already\r
+> does what it does - which is obviously to use the full dovecot format.\r
+>\r
+\r
+I see, you're talking about this "dovecot-keywords" file I guess\r
+\r
+ http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir\r
+\r
+Some questions that spring to mind:\r
+\r
+- This is clearly dovecot specific; I wonder what fraction of\r
+ our users would benefit. I suppose that's a question about any scheme\r
+ involving maildir-flags a-z; at least those can be synchronized ootb\r
+ by several tools.\r
+\r
+- Notmuch new currently only indexes one copy of a message, so two files\r
+ in different maildirs (i.e. a list and inbox) would be pretty much a\r
+ crapshoot which tags get applied. We intend to change this behaviour\r
+ eventually, but no one is working on it currently.\r
+\r
+- even if/when this behaviour changes, there is still the problem of\r
+ reconciling different tag mappings from several maildirs.\r
+\r
+On the other hand, maybe not much change to the notmuch core would be\r
+needed to at least experiment with this, using e.g. hooks to\r
+notmuch-insert and notmuch-new.\r