Re: [PATCH] test: make test_emacs call post-command-hook

diff --git a/dd/32ba7d8bf33ce504f539ec4121ed036900bf3a b/dd/32ba7d8bf33ce504f539ec4121ed036900bf3a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c69121d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dd/32ba7d8bf33ce504f539ec4121ed036900bf3a
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B61C431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:58:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 0NGaicBSEUNo for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:58:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6723D431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:58:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+       by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201801000B3;\r
+       Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:58:03 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+ David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,    notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: make test_emacs call post-command-hook\r
+In-Reply-To: <87d2jizjlu.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <1387064676-15508-6-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+       <1390354365-12311-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+       <87d2jizjlu.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+41~g8e7fabf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:58:03 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2lhy5whok.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:58:15 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, Jan 23 2014, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+\r
+>> What do you think about this alternate version?  it allows\r
+>> notmuch-test-progn to have the same syntax as progn. It seems about\r
+>> the same level of complexity to me; fwiw I prefer the let over the\r
+>> dolist/setq.\r
+>\r
+> This looks much nicer: a macro is definitely the right way to do this. \r
+>\r
+> I might be inclined to replace the let... by a prog1 but would be happy\r
+> either way on that.\r
+\r
+prog1! definitely ! :D\r
+\r
+>\r
+> Best wishes\r
+>\r
+> Mark\r
+>\r
+\r
+Tomi\r
+\r
+>> +(defmacro notmuch-test-progn (&rest body)\r
+>> +  (cons 'progn\r
+>> +   (mapcar\r
+>> +    (lambda (x) `(let ((ret ,x))\r
+>> +                   (notmuch-post-command)\r
+>> +                   ret))\r
+>> +    body)))\r