Re: [PATCH 1/2] add notmuch keybinding 'd'

diff --git a/50/1fb25dde42923c72b46aef24dec5a545655a6f b/50/1fb25dde42923c72b46aef24dec5a545655a6f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4d68ee8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/50/1fb25dde42923c72b46aef24dec5a545655a6f
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C51429E56\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2012 11:57:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id jmrp8T6KmaHq for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  3 Jan 2012 11:57:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com\r
+ [74.125.83.53])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 33A0D429E51   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2012 11:57:31 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so19652898eek.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:57:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.14.99.76 with SMTP id w52mr21584761eef.85.1325620648633;\r
+       Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:57:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe5cdc00-23.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+       [80.220.92.23])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b49sm178755416eec.9.2012.01.03.11.57.24\r
+       (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:57:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr=C3=A9?=\r
+       <anarcat@koumbit.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] add notmuch keybinding 'd'\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunvcos6dhp.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <1266408746-28549-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <1310841600-28281-1-git-send-email-anarcat@koumbit.org>\r
+       <cunvcos6dhp.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+178~gd3e683f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:57:22 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <8762gsy2xp.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:57:32 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:56:50 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:39:59 -0400, Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 <anarcat@koumbit=\r
+.org> wrote:\r
+> > It adds a tag 'deleted' and removes the tags 'inbox' and 'unread'. It\r
+> > works in show as well as in search mode\r
+>=20\r
+> Various people have asked for a keybinding to add a 'delete' tag. Is\r
+> this version the right one to choose?\r
+\r
+The code's there, and talk is cheap... but I'd rather like to see a\r
+solution that would make it easy for users to add arbitrary tagging\r
+operations to key bindings, instead of a fixed binding for "deleted".\r
+\r
+That way perhaps adding a default 'd' for "deleted" wouldn't feel so\r
+special either.\r
+\r
+> It seems sane to me (though I won't use it).\r
+\r
+I wouldn't use it either, and I don't use "deleted" tag in the first\r
+place. And even if I used it, I'd still like to keep the distinction\r
+between "deleted after reading" and "deleted unread", which this patch\r
+loses by removing the "unread" tag.\r
+\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r