Re: [notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.

diff --git a/ec/dc7212f3b224c4889315f541177b327961c365 b/ec/dc7212f3b224c4889315f541177b327961c365
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..721ffb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ec/dc7212f3b224c4889315f541177b327961c365
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+Return-Path: <jan@ryngle.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456DF431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:14:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id DRu5KemicwSc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:14:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-bw0-f210.google.com (mail-bw0-f210.google.com\r
+       [209.85.218.210])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FB1431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:14:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so6177766bwz.0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:14:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.204.20.82 with SMTP id e18mr2287299bkb.168.1259064847561; Tue,\r
+       24 Nov 2009 04:14:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <yun7htkcou6.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>\r
+       <87639122sx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <yunhbslpv3q.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>\r
+       <87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:14:07 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <f35dbb950911240414w14543aacoa57508ea28604e82@mail.gmail.com>\r
+From: Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:14:16 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> And notice, I don't think we'll need to do the "virtual tag" thing of\r
+> associating a tag name with a search and doing the work of making\r
+> notmuch maintain the consistency of that tag and search string. It will\r
+> be much more clean (and shouldn't be any less fast) to just do the\r
+> searches for the original search terms, (rather than searching for tag\r
+> terms that were previously applied by searching for the search terms).\r
+>\r
+> Then tags become something that are just for manual manipulation. What\r
+> do you think?\r
+\r
+I like this. I think this is much cleaner than the "virtual tag" approach.\r
+\r
+  -- Jan\r