Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues

diff --git a/f1/fd38d588bcb1a3ef75390f10057fa1950be7e3 b/f1/fd38d588bcb1a3ef75390f10057fa1950be7e3
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4ae7f26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f1/fd38d588bcb1a3ef75390f10057fa1950be7e3
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path:\r
+ <return-wjwb7w6bbxy77dhqms2eum4pp6@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624FC431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id v4pdr9kHARM3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (market.scs.stanford.edu [171.66.3.10])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46D8431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost.scs.stanford.edu\r
+ [127.0.0.1])  by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id\r
+ s3I07Y6O014355;       Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: (from dm@localhost)\r
+       by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s3I07Y4t009194;\r
+       Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Authentication-Warning: market.scs.stanford.edu: dm set sender to\r
+       return-wjwb7w6bbxy77dhqms2eum4pp6@ta.scs.stanford.edu using -f\r
+From: David Mazieres <dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu>\r
+To: Allan Streib <astreib@indiana.edu>\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues\r
+In-Reply-To: <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <871twvokwm.fsf@viking.indiana.edu>\r
+       <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <878ur37b5l.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-16 PDT\r
+       <mazieres-tnzx3thbrpqukbfpgvb2huwbe2@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:07:45 -0000\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Allan Streib <astreib@indiana.edu> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> I've been using notmuch on OpenBSD for a while, and I really appreciate\r
+>> the project.\r
+\r
+Since there is a thread on this...\r
+\r
+I'm using notmuch 0.17 on openbsd (from the ports tree).  My problem is\r
+that notmuch new is just unbearably slow.  I don't know if it's because\r
+I'm running the 32-bit (i386) mode or what, but it takes over one second\r
+per mail message.  E.g., this is typical of what I see when checking for\r
+new mail:\r
+\r
+        Processed 18 total files in 20s (0 files/sec.).\r
+        Added 5 new messages to the database.\r
+\r
+Linux is 10 times faster.  Have you seen any similar performance issues?\r
+\r
+David\r