Proposal: List-Id

diff --git a/cb/349e0e8ef1f25c1a7196784ee8b87c58997d64 b/cb/349e0e8ef1f25c1a7196784ee8b87c58997d64
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f3b1269
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cb/349e0e8ef1f25c1a7196784ee8b87c58997d64
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <hlieberman@setec.io>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55938431FCF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:10:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.438\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id PK0LPXOOlwDX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:10:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 423 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;\r
+       Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:10:21 PDT\r
+Received: from xmenrevolution.com (xmenrevolution.com [97.107.134.16])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8208D431FCB\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:10:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by xmenrevolution.com (Postfix, from userid 113)\r
+       id 62CDD16A96; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:03:17 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Received: from agartha (static-155-212-141-65.mas.onecommunications.net\r
+       [155.212.141.65])\r
+       by xmenrevolution.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FC2216A91;\r
+       Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:03:14 -0400 (EDT)\r
+From: Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@setec.io>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Proposal: List-Id\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:02:56 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87wq2huan3.fsf@setec.io>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:01:01 -0700\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:10:25 -0000\r
+\r
+Hello everyone!\r
+\r
+One of my (few) problems right now with notmuch is around mailing lists\r
+that are copied, either as CC or BCC, on various emails that go around.\r
+My filtering inside notmuch right now doesn't catch all the messages,\r
+since the only tag I can match on is "to:foo@bar.org" and not all\r
+messages have the to rewritten.\r
+\r
+The standard for identifying mailing lists seems to be List-Id, as per\r
+RFC 2919.  I can understand the desire to keep the number of headers\r
+included in the header block low, but I wonder if this might be a common\r
+enough use-case to suggest its inclusion.\r
+\r
+As a counter-argument, I can see the parallel to spam filtering which\r
+come with their own set of headers that are not special cased by\r
+notmuch, but there seems to be much more variety in headers there - as\r
+well as different user configurations.\r
+\r
+Thank you all for your help, and I'm looking forward to hearing your\r
+thoughts.  (I'm not yet subscribed, so please keep me CCed to the\r
+thread.)\r
+\r
+Sincerely,\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Harlan Lieberman-Berg\r
+~hlieberman\r