Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool
authorMarten Veldthuis <marten@veldthuis.com>
Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:51:58 +0000 (09:51 +0100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:35:50 +0000 (09:35 -0800)
e3/e96c97cb6ec972e8443d4eacbd6fd884fa8510 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/e3/e96c97cb6ec972e8443d4eacbd6fd884fa8510 b/e3/e96c97cb6ec972e8443d4eacbd6fd884fa8510
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9ac810f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+Return-Path: <marten@home.veldthuis.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57171431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 00:52:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id GVYpdwmKi0RA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat,  5 Dec 2009 00:52:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85A7431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 00:52:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp06.online.nl (smtp06.online.nl [194.134.42.51])\r
+       by mx.perfora.net (node=mxus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)\r
+       id 0MV7Yb-1Nc5bY1xlt-00YSrt for notmuch@notmuchmail.org;\r
+       Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:52:02 -0500\r
+Received: from smtp06.online.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by smtp06.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3AC96259;\r
+       Sat,  5 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from gopher (s55919504.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.145.149.4])\r
+       by smtp06.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP;\r
+       Sat,  5 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: by gopher (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 46ABD232262; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100 (CET)\r
+From: Marten Veldthuis <marten@veldthuis.com>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Michael Alan Dorman\r
+       <mdorman@ironicdesign.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <87hbs6dzjd.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <1259267025-28733-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net>\r
+       <1259788526-14205-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net>\r
+       <87zl5zfty5.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87k4x29732.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <87bpiefwdq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87aaxysjdj.fsf@vertex.dottedmag>\r
+       <87aaxyfuz4.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <20091204140946.644243f0@vimes.local>\r
+       <87hbs6dzjd.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:51:58 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87hbs5u7kh.fsf@home.veldthuis.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp06.online.nl)\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:52:03 -0000\r
+\r
+On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:39:50 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> But when viewing an actual message, I'm still planning on having notmuch\r
+> just return an arbitrary filename from the list of filenames associated\r
+> with that message. Does anyone see any problem with that? Can you think\r
+> of a case where you'd really care about seeing one or the other of\r
+> a particular duplicated message?\r
+\r
+As long as it's deterministic. But if you don't display the first\r
+filename received, couldn't you exploit this by spoofing message ids?\r
+\r
+-- \r
+- Marten\r