Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID

diff --git a/66/56daa2caf81784b8072ab0de6620c8a31c7092 b/66/56daa2caf81784b8072ab0de6620c8a31c7092
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c83c2ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/66/56daa2caf81784b8072ab0de6620c8a31c7092
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529A46DE140C\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.663\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, \r
+ SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 5YKtDOeL1XKt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52D26DE0C66\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:50 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+ by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A0C100080;\r
+ Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:16:02 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Erik Quaeghebeur <notmuch@equaeghe.nospammail.net>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID\r
+In-Reply-To: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad>\r
+References: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+32~g73439f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+ $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+ !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:16:02 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2a8odcsvx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:15:54 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, Jan 10 2016, Erik Quaeghebeur <notmuch@equaeghe.nospammail.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+> Hi,\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> I've become interested in notmuch. After looking at the documentation of\r
+> the Python bindings, I have the following questions:\r
+\r
+> * Is it correct that a message's Message-ID used as its unique key in the\r
+> notmuch database?\r
+\r
+yes\r
+\r
+> * If yes, is it correct that two messages with the same Message-ID, but\r
+> with different contents/other headers, will have only one entry in the\r
+> database?\r
+\r
+yes\r
+\r
+> * If yes, for resent messages\r
+> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.6), does notmuch use\r
+> (the chronologically last) Resent-Message-ID, or the Message-ID?\r
+\r
+the Message-ID\r
+\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> Best,\r
+\r
+likewise :)\r
+\r
+>\r
+> Erik\r
+\r
+\r
+Tomi\r