Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] literal folder: prefix, new path: prefix
authorTomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:39:46 +0000 (10:39 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:00:21 +0000 (10:00 -0800)
58/3f073b33cf4b1eea2009b26e23d519dac189e8 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/58/3f073b33cf4b1eea2009b26e23d519dac189e8 b/58/3f073b33cf4b1eea2009b26e23d519dac189e8
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..40cd8a0
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0242D431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  5 Mar 2014 00:40:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ccpsoQ3-Shh2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  5 Mar 2014 00:39:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C83A431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  5 Mar 2014 00:39:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+       by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C115E100245;\r
+       Wed,  5 Mar 2014 10:39:46 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] literal folder: prefix, new path: prefix\r
+In-Reply-To: <8738ix4qeg.fsf@tethera.net>\r
+References: <cover.1393105055.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <87mwh8mn58.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87siqxiwlc.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+       <8738ix4qeg.fsf@tethera.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+112~g4e0c1d5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:39:46 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2d2i13up9.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:40:03 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Mar 04 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+\r
+> Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:\r
+>\r
+>>\r
+>> I think we should use the prereq mechanism in the tests to check if a\r
+>> required test database is in place, skipping the test if not. This\r
+>> should be fairly straightforward to do, and does not care *how* the test\r
+>> database is to be fetched. (I'm undecided whether the test should verify\r
+>> the checksum, or the part that fetches the database. Minor detail.)\r
+>\r
+> Yep, prereqs sounds fine.  SHA256 verification is pretty fast (on the\r
+> scale of test suite operations), so I'd lean to doing it late, but\r
+> I could be convinced otherwise.\r
+\r
+I decline commenting on prereqs... ;/\r
+\r
+>>\r
+>> I know git annex in principle, but don't have any practical experience\r
+>> with it. I don't really have any ideas for that.\r
+>\r
+> Well, if you don't mind the rest of the setup (SHA256 sums checked,\r
+> tarballs fetched if needed), we can forge ahead for now.\r
+\r
+I can contribute script with interface \r
+\r
+./fetch-and-check.sh [--verify-only] destdir url sha256sum \r
+\r
+\r
+>\r
+> d\r
+\r
+\r
+Tomi\r