Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] emacs: selection-menu.el

diff --git a/ae/9bef65a93a419d61288ff93ec65164da4d984b b/ae/9bef65a93a419d61288ff93ec65164da4d984b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2451423
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ae/9bef65a93a419d61288ff93ec65164da4d984b
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+Return-Path: <tom.prince@ualberta.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1126431E82\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:12:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 7u2tKPXDNNkH for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:12:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from socrates.hocat.ca (socrates.hocat.ca [76.10.188.53])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3202431FD5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:12:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hermes.hocat.ca (hermes.hocat.ca [69.165.170.253])\r
+       by socrates.hocat.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id DE610155A4;\r
+       Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:44:07 -0700 (MST)\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 21413 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+       Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:43:40 -0000\r
+From: Tom Prince <tom.prince@ualberta.net>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] emacs: selection-menu.el\r
+In-Reply-To: <874nufx0qw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <1330009817-24148-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+       <874nufx0qw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+91~g871fc32 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.5\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:43:40 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <87linqg65v.fsf@hermes.hocat.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 03:12:43 -0000\r
+\r
+On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:36:23 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> I have played with this and I like the feel of it: it is much more\r
+> informative than completing-read and much less cluttered than\r
+> ido-completing-read. \r
+\r
+I wonder if the completion method should be customizable, rather than\r
+forcing a particular one? There is at least, ido-mode, anything,\r
+icicles, as various completion methods availble for emacs, suggesting\r
+that it is a personal thing which method one prefers.\r
+\r
+  Tom\r