Re: [PATCH] lib: Add a new prefix "list" to the search-terms syntax

diff --git a/34/4d2a4631b248fb0fc1f29f9a1d1886b083f580 b/34/4d2a4631b248fb0fc1f29f9a1d1886b083f580
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f89dec9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34/4d2a4631b248fb0fc1f29f9a1d1886b083f580
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD3A431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2013 14:56:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 3Dr2njDAmnJT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  8 Apr 2013 14:56:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3097A431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2013 14:56:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1UPK3E-0003gH-Nk; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:56:37 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1UPK38-0005iE-Ua; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:56:26 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: "Alexey I. Froloff" <raorn@raorn.name>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: Add a new prefix "list" to the search-terms syntax\r
+In-Reply-To: <20130408100336.GA1806@raorn.name>\r
+References: <1364996763-19718-1-git-send-email-raorn@raorn.name>\r
+       <874nfjj2lo.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20130408100336.GA1806@raorn.name>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+73~g1c450ec (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:56:26 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <877gkchek5.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:56:44 -0000\r
+\r
+"Alexey I. Froloff" <raorn@raorn.name> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 08:54:59AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:\r
+>> On the other hand, _notmuch_message_gen_terms does return a status. I\r
+>> agree that currently this status is not useful, but that could change in\r
+>> the future.  I also agree that the existing code does the same thing in\r
+>> a few places, but I think it's better not to introduce more.\r
+> Well, this is an adaptation of earlier patch, posted in this list\r
+> some time ago.\r
+\r
+Sure, no blame attaches. But somebody still needs to fix the patch or\r
+convince us it doesn't need fixing. \r
+\r
+>  Personally I see no reason in indexing list description.\r
+\r
+That's an independent question.  I guess there is the question of how\r
+much overhead this introduces into \r
+\r
+>> Any objections to the list: syntax?  The only issue I see is that at\r
+>> some point we will probably add a generic header search syntax, and this\r
+>> implicitly says list-id is more important/common than other headers.\r
+> Actual list ID differs from List-Id header value.  I can't give\r
+> an example of other message header with similar syntax other from\r
+> From/To/Cc, but those headers already specially processed.\r
+\r
+OK, that part seems relatively convincing to me.\r
+\r
+d\r