Sort by newest first from notmuch-hello ?
authorXavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:15:42 +0000 (00:15 +0100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:42:39 +0000 (09:42 -0800)
71/9ccb66d07d410526b32226592c960a138d571a [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/71/9ccb66d07d410526b32226592c960a138d571a b/71/9ccb66d07d410526b32226592c960a138d571a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9e209de
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3330431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:21 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.463\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id VK+ZRfvZAMJa for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
+       [88.164.105.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934B3431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33F32160D\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0100 (CET)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=\r
+       postfix; bh=DMmON/k157ZPMUTlhfVtc4zcwqc=; b=V7+WNcfh/Lp0XcFLQkAi\r
+       Bp39FacYnw2surLnGhmhLagNtZ8HTZsaUqtQZ+tDPtSEsjVF/Y0304UvbWfVsHCc\r
+       /gjQtYI5h7KZRiqQp828QaYGKtzLF1xHW4eiN9PKIl6doqAjCqwmkFMHNqElGDR8\r
+       kB1qeeWOUvkECV6Tlt7wAqc=\r
+Received: from maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
+       [88.164.105.66])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0100 (CET)\r
+From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Sort by newest first from notmuch-hello ?\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:15:42 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <m2obu04n6p.fsf@kcals.intra.maillard.im>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:58:22 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi,\r
+\r
+I am running latest release (0.11).\r
+I have set notmuch-search-oldest-first to t. When doing M-x\r
+notmuch-search, messages order does not respect this setting -i.e newest\r
+com firts -. On the other hand, from notmuch-hello I get expected\r
+behaviour.\r
+\r
+How can this be more "consistent" ?\r
+\r
+By the way, am I alone having hundreds thousand messages ? If not, what\r
+would you thing setting this variable to `nil' by default ? Having first\r
+messages at the top would be more usefull that scrolling down really far\r
+;-)\r
+\r
+Regards\r
+\r
+/Xavier\r