Re: Understanding the "replied" tag

diff --git a/29/49c9738f096c74b577624a2b606e8a97eb7c22 b/29/49c9738f096c74b577624a2b606e8a97eb7c22
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..87f4a78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/29/49c9738f096c74b577624a2b606e8a97eb7c22
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+Return-Path: <aclements@csail.mit.edu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DC66DE0AF8\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:17:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.276\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.173, \r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972,\r
+ UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id T4CoTR2pXMqa for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:17:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 300 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo;\r
+ Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:17:51 PDT\r
+Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu\r
+ [18.7.68.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CB96DE0948\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:17:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-AuditID: 12074422-f79c36d000000db3-83-557cb8f0c1f2\r
+Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35])\r
+ (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (Client did not present a certificate)\r
+ by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id\r
+ C6.D5.03507.1F8BC755; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 19:12:49 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11])\r
+ by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id t5DNCmYC005926;\r
+ Sat, 13 Jun 2015 19:12:48 -0400\r
+Received: from android-a7de331e64905891.n2vi.com\r
+ (c-73-15-188-162.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.15.188.162])\r
+ (authenticated bits=0)\r
+ (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)\r
+ by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id t5DNCjqk025002\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+ Sat, 13 Jun 2015 19:12:47 -0400\r
+User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAJhTkNjHDmii67Gn77szoeriEBEwMJ=4NMMQ0qUjX3-jppQk1w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References:\r
+ <CAJhTkNjHDmii67Gn77szoeriEBEwMJ=4NMMQ0qUjX3-jppQk1w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+Content-Type: text/plain;\r
+ charset=UTF-8\r
+Subject: Re: Understanding the "replied" tag\r
+From: Austin Clements <aclements@csail.mit.edu>\r
+Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:12:43 -0700\r
+To: Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Message-ID: <F7F869E6-8F28-4817-8177-46ED85E24293@csail.mit.edu>\r
+X-Brightmail-Tracker:\r
+ H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrDIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrPtxR02owfO17BbXb85ktmh6uovF\r
+ gclj56y77B7PVt1iDmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MpYMucMW8EV3oqbcxYwNjB2cHcxcnJICJhI\r
+ dO/bxAxhi0lcuLeerYuRi0NIYDGTxJZtu9lAEkICGxklOrZUQCSeMknM/7aEHSQhKqAgMW/y\r
+ REYQm1MgUKL131wWiIYAiSv7t4A18woISpyc+QQsziwgL9G8dTYzhK0pce34FrA5wgI6EpvO\r
+ fQGLswnoS6xYO4kVxGYRUJU4NvsKWI2IgJXEqesvWCFmOkj0317EOoFRYBaSFbOQrJiFZMUC\r
+ RuZVjLIpuVW6uYmZOcWpybrFyYl5ealFuqZ6uZkleqkppZsYQYHK7qK0g/HnQaVDjAIcjEo8\r
+ vA4ba0KFWBPLiitzDzFKcjApifJG7qkOFeJLyk+pzEgszogvKs1JLT7EKMHBrCTC+6IXqJw3\r
+ JbGyKrUoHyYlzcGiJM676QdfiJBAemJJanZqakFqEUxWhoNDSYL34HagRsGi1PTUirTMnBKE\r
+ NBMHJ8hwHqDhUjtAhhcXJOYWZ6ZD5E8xKkqJ864GaRYASWSU5sH1whLJK0ZxoFeEeVeCVPEA\r
+ kxBc9yugwUxAg9t7qkAGlyQipKQaGBcIPq1u/zhNXYLvh8KyCQ/6i6uaPHTW7znsOdH3L+cK\r
+ FUfNsIjoOU6VivLb5U5Pk+qfn7d+Ssl2c+U1t4un7g3JqSm+s3ll0jvvGxHu2998mlYyL3Jz\r
+ 3IPa5+vyTrr6p/99fcL5Zs/FXe2W5z9ZOC16Lqz45XjnqqXdNy3maxmLv50kyDVLQ1iJpTgj\r
+ 0VCLuag4EQD7St+u/wIAAA==\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 23:17:55 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi Xu. I may be misunderstanding your email, but it sounds like you want to know if a message has *any* reply message. That's not what the replied tag indicates. The replied tag indicates that *you* have sent a reply to a message. Mechanically, when you hit, say, r to start a reply and then send that message, notmuch tags the message you hit r on as "replied". That's the only time notmuch automatically sets this tag.\r
+\r
+On June 11, 2015 10:25:44 AM PDT, Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>Dear all,\r
+>\r
+>First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch\r
+>has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve\r
+>it and to help others to know how to use it.\r
+>\r
+>I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g.\r
+>using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check\r
+>for the "replied" tag. But often this tag is not there, even when\r
+>there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread\r
+>display and checking the message that replied to the message to make\r
+>sure it indeed has header "replied-to:<MSG-ID>").\r
+>\r
+>I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is\r
+>no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me.\r
+>\r
+>The following returns true:\r
+>notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags\r
+>\r
+>So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not\r
+>saying "replied" thread is correct.\r
+>\r
+>What is incorrect for my way of thinking about "replied"? Do I\r
+>misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags\r
+>correctly?\r
+>\r
+>Kind regards,\r
+>\r
+>Xu\r
+>_______________________________________________\r
+>notmuch mailing list\r
+>notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+>http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+\r