Re: Dangerous space bar key (was: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot)

diff --git a/3a/f2aeef41497ec006099ac255f27f90afae443a b/3a/f2aeef41497ec006099ac255f27f90afae443a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..91bdfb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3a/f2aeef41497ec006099ac255f27f90afae443a
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <racin@free.fr>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D16B431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  7 Jul 2011 11:49:46 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.001\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 1yAjwVO3W3DY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  7 Jul 2011 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FA2431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  7 Jul 2011 11:49:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from matthieu-netbook (unknown [82.239.207.166])\r
+       by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FC0A62C0;\r
+       Thu,  7 Jul 2011 20:49:36 +0200 (CEST)\r
+From: Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>,\r
+       Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: Dangerous space bar key (was: Preventing the user shooting\r
+       themself in the foot)\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAH-f9Ws6Ji_H3JnkJS1jtio8_-65C_J5iAOnn6XsGp7YSuX2eA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <86iproe86u.fsf@greenrd.plus.com> <877h7xafto.fsf@free.fr>\r
+       <87pqlpioew.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87wrfwpjdi.fsf@free.fr>\r
+       <CAH-f9Ws6Ji_H3JnkJS1jtio8_-65C_J5iAOnn6XsGp7YSuX2eA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6+mwhudson+1700~natty1 (http://notmuchmail.org)\r
+       Emacs/23.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:49:35 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87mxgqgc3k.fsf@free.fr>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:49:46 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:25:41 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:\r
+> Had I replaced it, though, there are two variations I would have\r
+> tried.=C2=A0 Have you guys considered these and, if so, any thoughts?\r
+>=20\r
+> * Make SPC mark the *current* message read and move to the next one,\r
+> rather than moving to the next and marking it read.=C2=A0 This way, you're\r
+> acknowledging the message as read once you've actually read it, rather\r
+> than having notmuch mark it read before you've actually read it.\r
+\r
+I agree. I think it's up to the user to define whether he read the\r
+message. In fact as a consequence, I have no use of the 'unread' tag.\r
+=20\r
+> * At the end of the thread, return to the index view.=C2=A0 This way, if\r
+> you want to archive the thread, you can still just press 'a', but if\r
+> you don't, you're already set to navigate to another thread.\r
+\r
+I would prefer just to do nothing (or bell) at the end of the\r
+thread. Sometimes the end of a message is just at the end of the screen,\r
+and I want to hit space to see the next message, so I think that\r
+returning to the index would surprise me (as going to the next thread\r
+does).\r
+\r
+But this could be a third option if some people prefer that. So we would\r
+have:\r
+- do nothing\r
+- archive go to the next thread\r
+- return to the index\r
+\r
+Matthieu\r