Re: [notmuch] Bulk message tagging
authorXavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:56:48 +0000 (15:56 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:36:34 +0000 (09:36 -0800)
80/f91edb71dc026120e219552477842961c46620 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/80/f91edb71dc026120e219552477842961c46620 b/80/f91edb71dc026120e219552477842961c46620
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0a9598d
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+Return-Path: <xavier@maillard.im>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FA5418C34\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.492\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1]\r
+       autolearn=no\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id GsGP-meTBkVu for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [82.244.211.40])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3493418C37\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358061E077;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:24:17 +0200 (CEST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version\r
+       :content-type; s=postfix; bh=VhXikwQCiLospmaQeC6xb4o/d6U=; b=HwR\r
+       YYScJYDjBxhUeWq2aUWBlnROfnenwpOERwi6cOUynjmUWHS/9yt9UJqE9ZiaUlUx\r
+       0K9MBDwQpo8PvCydyOmAB1LstHS4241Nu/FKSfdxrTOykCZzrQpEp6IA/Pev0+a9\r
+       4msIo9aR3RFOOjCn0scxvhqD3XFeXoQbmtSIyvXU=\r
+Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:24:17 +0200 (CEST)\r
+From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
+To: Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com>, Jesse Rosenthal\r
+       <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>, "notmuch\@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Bulk message tagging\r
+In-Reply-To: <3wdmxxg4axm.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>\r
+References: <m2tyrrkf32.fsf@deb.maillard.im> <87sk7b30tg.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+       <m2bpdye86s.fsf@deb.maillard.im> <3wdmxxg4axm.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>\r
+Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:56:48 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2wrwf76n3.fsf@deb.maillard.im>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:24:19 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi,\r
+\r
+On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com> wrote:\r
+> \r
+> I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we\r
+> shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means\r
+> 'tag all the threads that I can see in this buffer'.\r
+\r
+This is exactly what my initial post asked for. '*' is not\r
+totally satisfying for me due to the "limitations" you\r
+exposed. Though It is a good and acceptable workaround for me.\r
+As said, I just have to pay attention to redo my search query\r
+before pressing the '*' key.\r
+\r
+Xavier\r