Re: Solaris support - missing or incompatible functions

diff --git a/6f/1bd3dd276fede44e845cb4cfc01beb0c4f2a68 b/6f/1bd3dd276fede44e845cb4cfc01beb0c4f2a68
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5fd3922
--- /dev/null
+++ b/6f/1bd3dd276fede44e845cb4cfc01beb0c4f2a68
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+Return-Path: <Vladimir.Marek@Oracle.COM>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7BC431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:22:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.299\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id tsk6SoXFJHZ6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 12 May 2013 13:21:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302B7431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:21:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93])\r
+       by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with\r
+       ESMTP id r4CKLoNL011269\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);\r
+       Sun, 12 May 2013 20:21:51 GMT\r
+Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230])\r
+       by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id\r
+       r4CKLoH4013696\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);\r
+       Sun, 12 May 2013 20:21:50 GMT\r
+Received: from abhmt116.oracle.com (abhmt116.oracle.com [141.146.116.68])\r
+       by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id\r
+       r4CKLnMw029046; Sun, 12 May 2013 20:21:49 GMT\r
+Received: from vi64-x3-2e-prg06.cz.oracle.com (/10.163.102.127)\r
+       by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)\r
+       with ESMTP ; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:21:49 -0700\r
+Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 22:21:45 +0200\r
+From: Vladimir Marek <Vladimir.Marek@Oracle.COM>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Solaris support - missing or incompatible functions\r
+Message-ID: <20130512202145.GA2047@vi64-x3-2e-prg06.cz.oracle.com>\r
+References: <1367853362-11846-1-git-send-email-Vladimir.Marek@oracle.com>\r
+       <87ehdc9dbh.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ehdc9dbh.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/ (2012-12-30)\r
+X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:22:01 -0000\r
+\r
+> > I can't run the notmuch 'make test' on Solaris (too old bash) and on linux the\r
+> > results are\r
+> >\r
+> > 421/525 tests passed.\r
+> > 25 tests failed.\r
+> > 79 tests skipped.\r
+> >\r
+> > but they are the same without my changes too ...\r
+> \r
+> The series LGTM, except I didn't pay much attention to the timegm()\r
+> implementation. I hope the time parsing tests pass though. If they do,\r
+> and you think the implementation is good enough, then who am I to\r
+> argue. ;)\r
+\r
+\r
+I didn't pay too much attention to the test output as it's broken on\r
+linux too :)\r
+\r
+Thank you\r
+-- \r
+       Vlad\r