--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6B2431FC0\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:22:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id yEZujMmb6P+0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:22:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30504431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:22:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+ by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B0C1001F0;\r
+ Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:22:01 +0300 (EEST)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, Vladimir.Marek@oracle.com,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't store temporary value returned from c_str()\r
+In-Reply-To: <878v44qhop.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <1366405933-17223-1-git-send-email-Vladimir.Marek@oracle.com>\r
+ <878v44qhop.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+75~gd7fa7c4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+ $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+ !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:22:01 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <m261z8hzwm.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: Vladimir Marek <vlmarek@volny.cz>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:22:07 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, Apr 27 2013, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+\r
+> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Vladimir.Marek@oracle.com wrote:\r
+>> From: Vladimir Marek <vlmarek@volny.cz>\r
+>>\r
+>> This is causing problems when compiled by Oracle Studio. Memory pointed\r
+>> by (const char*)term was already changed once talloc_strdup was called.\r
+>>\r
+>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Marek <vlmarek@volny.cz>\r
+>> ---\r
+>> lib/message.cc | 9 ++++-----\r
+>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)\r
+>>\r
+>> diff --git a/lib/message.cc b/lib/message.cc\r
+>> index 8720c1b..8d329d1 100644\r
+>> --- a/lib/message.cc\r
+>> +++ b/lib/message.cc\r
+>> @@ -266,18 +266,17 @@ _notmuch_message_get_term (notmuch_message_t *message,\r
+>> const char *prefix)\r
+>> {\r
+>> int prefix_len = strlen (prefix);\r
+>> - const char *term = NULL;\r
+>> char *value;\r
+>> \r
+>> i.skip_to (prefix);\r
+>> \r
+>> - if (i != end)\r
+>> - term = (*i).c_str ();\r
+>\r
+> It's okay to use the result of .c_str() as long as the string object\r
+> stays in scope, and none of the non-const member functions are\r
+> called. Here, I think the problem is that TermIterator's overloaded\r
+> operator*() returns a string object within the if block's scope, and it\r
+> goes immediately out of scope. You could check this by adding\r
+>\r
+> string s = *i;\r
+>\r
+> in function scope, and replacing (*i) with s in the if block. This might\r
+> also be more obvious than the presented patch, but I think the patch is\r
+> fine too.\r
+\r
+Thanks, now I understand. I'd like to see updated patch using Jani's\r
+example but I also think that the current patch is fine too.\r
+\r
+>\r
+> BR,\r
+> Jani.\r
+\r
+Tomi\r
+\r
+>\r
+>\r
+>> + if (i == end)\r
+>> + return NULL;\r
+>> \r
+>> - if (!term || strncmp (term, prefix, prefix_len))\r
+>> + if (strncmp ((*i).c_str(), prefix, prefix_len))\r
+>> return NULL;\r
+>> \r
+>> - value = talloc_strdup (message, term + prefix_len);\r
+>> + value = talloc_strdup (message, (*i).c_str() + prefix_len);\r
+>> \r
+>> #if DEBUG_DATABASE_SANITY\r
+>> i++;\r
+>> -- \r
+>> 1.7.3.2\r
+>>\r
+>> _______________________________________________\r
+>> notmuch mailing list\r
+>> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+>> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r