Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce the add command
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 20:25:31 +0000 (13:25 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:56:07 +0000 (09:56 -0800)
d4/dd0261e32f90bfa475dc10ca9d8e9ed2cede64 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/d4/dd0261e32f90bfa475dc10ca9d8e9ed2cede64 b/d4/dd0261e32f90bfa475dc10ca9d8e9ed2cede64
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ae71634
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF28431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:25:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id wbUtbY4d9WoR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:25:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9EF431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:25:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18F52E50EDC;\r
+       Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:25:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (ool-18599e04.static.optonline.net\r
+       [24.89.158.4]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841322E50E6B;\r
+       Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:25:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id F07D66227E; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:25:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+       Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce the add command\r
+In-Reply-To: <87r4es8h0p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <1373762746-22308-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+       <87wqom8v2x.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87r4es8h0p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+223~g3484372 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:25:31 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87bo5vu0ck.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 20:25:48 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Sun, Jul 21 2013, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> I sort of agree but wonder if it would be more natural under "new" than\r
+> "insert". so notmuch new /path/to/file just adds that file (provided it\r
+> is in the database; perhaps a relative path?) This would also be\r
+> extensible to do a whole mail sub-directory which seems like it might\r
+> also be a useful feature. (I am definitely not saying that this needs to\r
+> be implemented now!)\r
+\r
+Oh, yeah, good call.  That definitely seems more natural to me as well.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJR7EO7AAoJEO00zqvie6q8xUgP/2FnbtogE63bmt+wAy0tpaD/\r
+33dggh7xSopvK73HHazN6TDSHGcQP9X1wxURNtrlKqIMXbMaifFXWT0rASuyEfd2\r
+4P2Ds75+v5I0frolpEnuxaAmVPRw2a31yL1kcrTnocV6tkGvK5QtPyewaKEAwFQQ\r
+4SFyGiKPQ+sKvFEs221LGKhSZpjfB3oge6YjqdVy1LI6KwqauZqFdavXm6gmhvfG\r
+Cr7WNX1lN2O4+gxSnNQwMvEGTPmaP5EIfQ/72VL4BdpguJwh53Gq8OIXo+4E8038\r
+lkXWnmT/UDN7RgBwkJPWHgN22WSbKd/zi8Z0fc1qvtSngZrkXRgVbHw549oJ6PwV\r
+EvgioURf2Wvtyx2659VuaZW2q6xYaDsFgtJNn69WVD2tLIqP+fwpFgt5eMi9fP8k\r
+w2mc1tnDIKLEAjvQw2Pemdq/uGx9vIjC1UsE7JXhOuX8OjWsuxJli4ZWHMF8hzde\r
+f1OZMRiLdK+BM32PlMNLySyYafQjL8HkIsYTkTKKYFtFNIBKfZAvIgv9DfY4sJJ/\r
+DFIEfht8rvmwzv1TyYIXjPRqS6t2HtN70Hrlrjs7Vfar3qtP9YnkX+3FMD1+xuvk\r
+UZcZ8Dm1F5Ik6YRv7YTNghotdI/YZcMz7jZl59ZbW1LvJPJXqkTGvNupQKutQ6uX\r
+hP+quiTGqlZmFpDulita\r
+=WOr+\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r