Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?

diff --git a/56/30b4b8e50e732d33cffaf5089143a22a1193ef b/56/30b4b8e50e732d33cffaf5089143a22a1193ef
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6d47576
--- /dev/null
+++ b/56/30b4b8e50e732d33cffaf5089143a22a1193ef
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD5B6DE192B\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:17:50 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.307\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244,\r
+  RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id i9Xs4xE0IU7N for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:17:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0EC6DE1903\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:17:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1aUeki-00057g-TI; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:17:04 -0500\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 22381 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:17:44 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>\r
+Cc: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?\r
+In-Reply-To: <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>\r
+References: <cun37t5r91p.fsf@disaster-area.hh.sledj.net>\r
+ <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:17:44 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:17:50 -0000\r
+\r
+"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:33:10AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:\r
+>> We can include it in /usr/bin along and install a proper man page=E2=80=\r
+=A6\r
+>\r
+> I'm happy to write up a man page.  Do you want it in a separate\r
+> directory from nmbug-status / notmuch-report [1]?  Do you want to\r
+> rename nmbug to something notmuch-* namespaced?\r
+>\r
+\r
+I guess if we're going to treat it as a first class citizen, then yeah,\r
+it should be in the notmuch- namespace. It would also need some tests.\r
+I'm not sure how (or if) to address the problem that most notmuch\r
+commands are actually invoked via the main binary, but I don't think we\r
+have any logic to transform "notmuch foo" to a call to an external\r
+binary notmuch-foo.\r
+\r
+d\r