--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jason@jasonwoof.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7D4431FD0\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id rH-dovlt2v7f for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com\r
+ [209.85.216.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526F7431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so2617827qyk.5\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.224.194.194 with SMTP id dz2mr2495272qab.58.1314117554924;\r
+ Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from lemote.jasonwoof.com (rrcs-50-75-61-2.nys.biz.rr.com\r
+ [50.75.61.2])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m11sm83657qcw.7.2011.08.23.09.39.13\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+ Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:39:09 -0400\r
+From: Jason Woofenden <jason@jasonwoof.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] add user friendly date range search\r
+Message-ID: <20110823163908.GD2968@lemote.jasonwoof.com>\r
+Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+References: <cover.1312964528.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+ <87bovryqp0.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <87bovryqp0.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:39:19 -0000\r
+\r
+Here's my thoughts on date/range syntax:\r
+\r
+I think: date:monday should show only e-mails that arrived on\r
+monday (not also emails that arrived since then.) Because that's\r
+what it looks like it does.\r
+\r
+I think a very common use of date ranges will be from some time\r
+until now. So I'd like that to be easy. I suggest this syntax:\r
+\r
+ since:monday\r
+\r
+which would be a shorthand for:\r
+\r
+ date:monday-00:00:00..now\r
+\r
+If that's not a popular idea, then we should at least be able to\r
+use this shorthand for the same:\r
+\r
+ date:monday..\r
+\r
+Also, I think it's quite valuable to have "yesterday" work as a\r
+date.\r
+\r
+That's all.\r
+\r
+ - Jason\r