Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Add support for saved search accelerators

diff --git a/df/f002152e508b4e788389d06652e59340481725 b/df/f002152e508b4e788389d06652e59340481725
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4f870f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/df/f002152e508b4e788389d06652e59340481725
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDDF431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:06:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.502\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id H9pPXlj9NFid for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56577431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1X6LMT-0001Yq-SO; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 16:06:46 +0100\r
+Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1X6LMT-0006eN-DZ; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 16:06:45 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Add support for saved search accelerators\r
+In-Reply-To: <20140713143235.GA4660@mit.edu>\r
+References: <1399385776-19918-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1399461694-25350-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1399461694-25350-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <87ion2gyqo.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <20140713035009.GZ4660@mit.edu>\r
+       <87bnstfiha.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <20140713143235.GA4660@mit.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+615~g78e3a93 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 16:06:44 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87r41pjo1n.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162\r
+X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc,\r
+       this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB).\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 2695dc5386294a6383919217315fb7fc (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.1\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -0.1 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:06:58 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+> Quoth David Bremner on Jul 13 at 11:20 am:\r
+>> Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> writes:\r
+>> \r
+>> > The right answer might be something between notmuch-go and dme's\r
+>> > patch.  Currently notmuch-go uses a hard-coded set of searches, while\r
+>> > dme's patch derives them from the saved searches.\r
+>> \r
+>> I'm not really looking for a solution for my own use, just wearing my\r
+>> integration manager hat. In that context, a second set of hard coded\r
+>> saved searches would be a blocker.\r
+>\r
+> Sorry, it seems my email wasn't clear.  Does notmuch-go address your\r
+> user unfriendliness concerns with dme's patch?\r
+>\r
+> If so, we should combine notmuch-go's UI with dme's customizable key\r
+> bindings and think about pushing that (clearly we wouldn't push\r
+> notmuch-go as it is).\r
+\r
+I think dme's patch is only user unfriendly if there are no saved\r
+searches configured: if there are some then ? shows them. The problem is\r
+that ? does nothing if there aren't any.\r
+\r
+I don't know whether always showing the bindings (like notmuch-go) or\r
+only showing them after ? is pressed (like this series) is better.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r