Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html

diff --git a/b1/e38b1b345ccca0dad57f894d311830e822790b b/b1/e38b1b345ccca0dad57f894d311830e822790b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..82bf0c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b1/e38b1b345ccca0dad57f894d311830e822790b
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8186DE1843\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:10:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.557\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.163,\r
+  DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 2M3hwhOCneCr for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:10:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.53]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382E66DE1842 for\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:10:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n186so77276454wmn.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:10:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=nikula-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;\r
+ h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version;\r
+ bh=A6XqrnCFWO3Ay4ngMJ8fsIjboXkj+bfuOWH0uBMkuUw=;\r
+ b=QPPEnF2kQze79ttVQNWHIU4pbiHwkS9wZ6ZJrzFPCEkIYXNWpQNfhwJxqdgvhsnWdQ\r
+ S/G1+CJGmrW3nTM5wK2CV4fekTsW6BEHdoh4KtiMU17qrkuvveYg6EeqhohnlYInFGQX\r
+ /FGpReSNhZ6IeuR2zEZatuyiwhKJIy7TMLscJ61xTTJBXusZgH2fZYyn/iytTITPaXug\r
+ nVzjpTxFPIwnjAeRjTILiI+jH7xOfanN6DLL0AEqak14rlKIMym7fMwzSLK63cdHVfXs\r
+ XZ8we16PsoxgfXlgvbFY03hF1japhuDIYxiAwZhXrJTkYZ+amqnz/4SRxA6WjZK/QBc9\r
+ ds1A==\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
+ :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version;\r
+ bh=A6XqrnCFWO3Ay4ngMJ8fsIjboXkj+bfuOWH0uBMkuUw=;\r
+ b=nGCaNY06tJa8t5OeJQPd/3T4dLF1oYdMEjT8jKDlzIcqJsxAgSnXHdTIUhG2SkhKEy\r
+ mRlX72EZ/tec4qyfpxPLPzhdcsSORFD7Wyg8hVQn7WPgYof/fw1xWq8/87Ve5Uv6ZzOM\r
+ AWq4fTyH6Cu2RK0wAHz9YYsXGBW7gSMHkzoq97nqA0AlzPnxBojfSiEem7Oj/Bvshxwt\r
+ rQJJnn+QRpqsWxa6JtXebLYWxnAdLHw75OoM57sxTcSZywZpuMX0hzl55z+zmDxq9h+m\r
+ +dYjLvGBYV7RmqhTnl7DzbWP0UFW+am9oy1AwSRX/Ajrj+mB/KMGdRisvaTu500zjZKd\r
+ xIiA==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ AD7BkJKXFiDqMZCD4gmRBmwR3vEHBE5GYP85u7akKQ+67swNpWQUz9nwAUf3jevN1ajNmA==\r
+X-Received: by 10.28.216.141 with SMTP id p135mr13686021wmg.22.1457885403525; \r
+ Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:10:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bcee39-255.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+ [188.238.57.255])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s66sm12201357wmb.6.2016.03.13.09.10.02\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+ Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:10:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2shzvrccn.fsf@dme.org>\r
+References: <f50e07855e9bbbdd780ef925d8e2d879.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+ <m2a8miwc6x.fsf@dme.org>\r
+ <c4ff9f2c141441be10b1cb4b1e0300a7.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>\r
+ <56DD48B3.90604@bubblegen.co.uk> <87mvqatr6y.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <87h9gigfyz.fsf@bubblegen.co.uk> <87pov58b9y.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <m260wxkvf3.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <87wpp76ctq.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <m2shzvrccn.fsf@dme.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+74~g711eac8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:09:00 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <874mcapdgj.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:10:08 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> Is "reply" from search mode a common pattern of use? Currently it seems\r
+> generally un-useful (the thread has to contain just a single message -\r
+> not just a single matching message).\r
+\r
+I wish we could make it useful again. It was one of the neat features of\r
+notmuch to be able to reply to multiple messages at once. Either all\r
+messages in a thread from search view, or all expanded messages in a\r
+thread from show view. We threw this out to make it easier to improve\r
+the normal reply code.\r
+\r
+As to whether it was a common pattern or not, I don't recall a single\r
+complaint after the feature was dropped.\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r
+\r