Re: notmuch on w32
authorFelipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:22:32 +0000 (15:22 +1900)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:57:28 +0000 (09:57 -0800)
96/6db722d61240a0750e64fc723fc37fd6d5ff05 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/96/6db722d61240a0750e64fc723fc37fd6d5ff05 b/96/6db722d61240a0750e64fc723fc37fd6d5ff05
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..00b6dc7
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B04431FC4\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:30:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id K5-lIEL746+S for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:30:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com\r
+       [209.85.217.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4632E431FC3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:30:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x18so2572200lbi.16\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:30:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+       :cc:content-type;\r
+       bh=FW0HO/Crt6qoiPdK4pSVP2ZueYaFVYBS+EsDnnvvDCY=;\r
+       b=MVi/QAlYJznRogCMZLBZFHOW8nZT2mWKcGmGhOTr328snO7S/BZWLrsx8r440f71kH\r
+       LaD+kxUh/Tt/TRfzkBcNEzVjV3KrQFyx9CDpQVz86p7iiqdvhZpH16IwIoOsWWOo5fLD\r
+       kepJY2ufg69UQn0yDl6BQtsR35ha+kurc1lDqfuhPjbxJxEb8Fb7WLIBxqWgvnM7HVga\r
+       UOTE/lcKwNhW8f/pqsH6ufgThdVfrEKuomp1q5rOI0oXY69Bb7tmLksvgt22+XaajQYT\r
+       Eq7OWdnUwvUbqThMTHJn6jXndwTbvNkqVWBU/f8N+407DA68HYu1oD/UB3KLcD/+8Xxk\r
+       5ZBA==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+X-Received: by 10.112.131.68 with SMTP id ok4mr2958007lbb.13.1382214153195;\r
+       Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:22:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.114.201.69 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:22:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87bo2lvxx3.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87mwm71x91.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com>\r
+       <87bo2lvxx3.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:22:32 -0500\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMP44s3UeDJVYY+qDjyJ6qKOWZ59tyGzj776HrGh=wMV_JvnvQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch on w32\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>,\r
+       Claudio Bley <claudio.bley@googlemail.com>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:30:48 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:54 PM, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> Claudio Bley <claudio.bley@googlemail.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> I wanted to use notmuch on MS Windows and thus have ported the code to\r
+>> be able to compile with MinGW and MSYS using the GNU autotools on that\r
+>> platform.\r
+>\r
+> Do you really need autotools, or was it just the easiest path to get\r
+> things working on w32?\r
+\r
+No, you don't. I've compiled many things for Windows using MinGW, and\r
+you don't need autotools.\r
+\r
+In fact, autotools makes things worst (as usual), by requiring m4,\r
+perl, and bunch of heavy dependencies.\r
+\r
+% make CROSS_COMPILE=i486-mingw32-\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r