--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E404431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:34:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.401\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 7ajRfi1lj5Ep for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:34:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE76C431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:34:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1V11GO-0006lv-Du; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:33:56 +0100\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1V11GO-000422-2E; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:33:56 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: second freeze for 0.16, now with more freezieness\r
+In-Reply-To: <m238r71vpm.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <87ip0rj7vn.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ip05e73v.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <m238r71vpm.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+192~g8222af3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:33:52 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87txjnegxr.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: ba8aead382c92e69a2a31c00d903f384 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.6\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored 0.6 points. Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails\r
+ * -0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 21:34:11 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:\r
+> On Sat, Jul 20 2013, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+>\r
+>> David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+>>\r
+>>> Hi Gang;\r
+>>>\r
+>>> I'll be off the grid for about 12 days, starting on Friday. I thought\r
+>>> that made pretty good sense as a freeze time. On the other hand, I\r
+>>> realize people may have a few last minute items (hopefully small) for\r
+>>> 0.16, so I will consider such suggestions when I get back.\r
+>>>\r
+>>\r
+>> I have added 5 more patches to the release (and master) branch, including\r
+>> jrollins' crypto bugfix. Hopefully this is very close to release, please\r
+>> test.\r
+>\r
+> I'd say 1fd1e57 (with some NEWS) is good for release. I've been running\r
+> 3484372 w/ id:1374163617-23740-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi\r
+>\r
+> Since 3484372 was pushed and this has been working fine (i.e. the same\r
+> from testing perspective).\r
+\r
+What about adding\r
+id:1372976299-30389-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com to the\r
+release branch (but not trunk). Then whatever correct fix we decide on\r
+can go in later and we avoid a potential string of bug reports from\r
+0.16?\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r