Re: Possible some threads are not complete due to bug?

diff --git a/9c/54ed4024e8cb07008c7b0dc90ae01cb78d8c99 b/9c/54ed4024e8cb07008c7b0dc90ae01cb78d8c99
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e81c5eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9c/54ed4024e8cb07008c7b0dc90ae01cb78d8c99
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF996DE0FF8\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:45:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.113\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.113 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id pNek23zwqs4n for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B3456DE0FF7\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1Zesm0-0003q4-Jp; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:44:24 +0000\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 8308 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 23 Sep 2015\r
+ 22:44:05 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Possible some threads are not complete due to bug?\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAJhTkNgBdnm18UXC95ryJk5w7fJpa7-1LvdugV3S29fL4kxxhQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References:\r
+ <CAJhTkNh7_hXDLsAGyD7nwkXV4ca6ymkLtFG945USvfqK4ZJEdQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+ <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+ <CAJhTkNgBdnm18UXC95ryJk5w7fJpa7-1LvdugV3S29fL4kxxhQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+73~gd432116 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:44:05 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87zj0c3gei.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:45:54 -0000\r
+\r
+Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> Because when I do a notmuch search for that message by message ID with\r
+> --output=threads, it gives a different thread ID.\r
+>\r
+>> Isn't that what your first command tells you?\r
+> Well yes, but I wanted to confirm that that is indeed the reason. I\r
+> have heard in someone saying that debugging is process of confirming\r
+> things that should be true.\r
+\r
+I'm still confused. It sounds like you gave the same command twice and\r
+got different answers. Can you maybe show the complete sequence of\r
+commands and output (assuming it's not too large)?\r
+\r
+d\r