> I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write
> a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.
>
-> Question: does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
+> Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
> that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing
> without images?
+>
+> I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg.
+> \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename
+> the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this
+> same plugin?
>
> Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the
> htmlsanitizer strips those since they can be used to insert javascript. I