Re: [PATCH 2/8] emacs: update tag-completion function

diff --git a/e3/2b383c2bc00fae59bff317356d3a3e96e8bc2c b/e3/2b383c2bc00fae59bff317356d3a3e96e8bc2c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..58bcfc1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/e3/2b383c2bc00fae59bff317356d3a3e96e8bc2c
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6E3418C31\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  9 Apr 2012 11:09:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 4wLlqkyXX0F4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  9 Apr 2012 11:09:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FF0403508\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  9 Apr 2012 11:09:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D9E2E50D93;\r
+       Mon,  9 Apr 2012 11:09:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-225.ligo.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.114.225])    (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by fire-doxen-submit\r
+ (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4049A328016;  Mon,  9 Apr 2012 11:09:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 1B48F762; Mon,  9 Apr 2012 11:09:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] emacs: update tag-completion function\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vi4n5zn.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <1333354853-25729-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1333845338-22960-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1333845338-22960-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1333845338-22960-3-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <878vi4n5zn.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+108~g7bdb40c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:09:21 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87pqbgkca6.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:09:30 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, Apr 09 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>> -         nil "search-tags" search-terms)))\r
+>> +         nil "search" "--output=3Dtags" search-terms)))\r
+>\r
+> Perhaps make this=20\r
+>   + nil "search" "--output=3Dtags" "--exclude=3Dfalse" search-terms)))\r
+>\r
+> to fix the existing bug that if the message is excluded the completion\r
+> can get confused. Or I can submit that separately if you prefer.\r
+\r
+Hey, Mark.  Yes, that was included as a separate patch in v1 of the\r
+series, but now that your exclude stuff has been pushed this should be\r
+included as well.  I'll send a patch for this now.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPgyXRAAoJEO00zqvie6q8dLsQALUqA0+3W/pkBtT+BG64TR62\r
+JVpel/eDu8+2h0xgiHqT0csWhIgh1DKhXhOyfRxyQY1uKUu/6H6YFlb44On5Nmwk\r
+mgee4C5EffO4Ag/ZqEizOZdF2AUzBh6fdDGtcpawSygEdMlMnVOf8rGGdYhtsU3Y\r
+gNd69bu8cxfBUj/RDrY3rSmx22hBxrVMnOG5QlL751ImgI3z3JCaixiW4thldJZh\r
+1a6FQVymylQKkb4PaJnfJ9GL/TpmZK5clyuYNaG5IhnS7h0Jn3J+p9GG8v6Tzg9P\r
++gCl4hR70Hs4CnHh64kpAqQ0FqAM6K6gazZFeefPfVeO7iT7LYUC1h9JOsHCMeGH\r
+yuUSB13kWBt8uUSQn6c87dLmzGY703fAjDac+12mpsLLx1gUB6JJysyIMzS96eOW\r
+zF43nhAeK3prN7FbzEdywMW+oZvLltumVj+mWaomCM5XtFZ7J7CS7yt2hvSbXFC+\r
+q8DnnR7d8kxZDckvBtNPoTXloDMwOIF3DldKsAHxh7yIBfguRICLDqCKtg70fiYA\r
+uWkSlYxET+AT2J/Yop+j4b7oTuu/HB8VCx5yrSlaIepS6aSnPqrvq9aemJ0b8aI4\r
+dYwHcJf89lPjD5qcxFPPOdQ3hZxDdeOyVi2z5KMUdUnkVMYXR4CKDHZ4M4Dahwkc\r
+IypKv2P5n3nuqJksc0Kc\r
+=wS0I\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r