Re: v4 of DB_RETRY_LOCK patches

diff --git a/f9/dc2e15ffdc56c8f11fa34430e02b45ff111ce7 b/f9/dc2e15ffdc56c8f11fa34430e02b45ff111ce7
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ec55612
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f9/dc2e15ffdc56c8f11fa34430e02b45ff111ce7
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+Return-Path: <notmuch@kismala.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BE46DE035F\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.055\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.055 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id riX9apSYj4vt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:48:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 1439 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo;\r
+ Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:48:58 PDT\r
+Received: from imarko.xen.prgmr.com (imarko.xen.prgmr.com [71.19.158.228])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4046DE0361\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:48:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=zsu.kismala.com)\r
+ by imarko.xen.prgmr.com with esmtp (Exim 4.85)\r
+ (envelope-from <notmuch@kismala.com>)\r
+ id 1bHFfs-0008Ew-TQ; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:24:56 -0700\r
+From: Istvan Marko <notmuch@kismala.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: v4 of DB_RETRY_LOCK patches\r
+In-Reply-To: <1466954985-25761-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+References: <1466954985-25761-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+54~g35e252c (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.95.1\r
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:24:56 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <m3inwvn46v.fsf@zsu.kismala.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:49:06 -0000\r
+\r
+Thanks for getting this into shape, LGTM.\r
+\r
+FWIW, I have been running with DB_RETRY_LOCK for the past couple of\r
+months on a fairly large mail spool (500K emails), a high incoming\r
+volume and many tagging rules. So far it's been working great. No\r
+deadlocks, any delays waiting for locks are barely noticeable and it's\r
+so nice not having to deal with those annoying "already locked"\r
+failures.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+       Istvan\r