--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76846431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:21:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id gnuXrF8v2DrE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:21:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE54431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:21:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1W6q3u-0006dO-LN; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:21:22 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 8122 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 24 Jan 2014\r
+ 23:21:18 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Austin Clements <aclements@csail.mit.edu>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, \r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal\r
+In-Reply-To: <87y525m649.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>\r
+References: <cover.1389304779.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+ <87y525m649.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+35~g3b36898 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:21:18 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <874n4totjl.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:21:35 -0000\r
+\r
+Austin Clements <aclements@csail.mit.edu> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Thu, 09 Jan 2014, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+>\r
+> I strongly disagree with requiring the cur/new component. The cur/new\r
+> directory is an internal implementation detail of Maildir (and a rather\r
+> broken one at that) and no more a part of the "folder" of a piece of\r
+> mail than its final file name component. It's also the less obvious\r
+> user interface; if we require the cur/new component, we *will* get\r
+> people asking why their folder searches aren't working, but if we strip\r
+> the cur/new component, nobody will be surprised.\r
+>\r
+\r
+My gut instinct agrees with Austin here, at least for a prefix named\r
+"folder". Some factors I remember\r
+\r
+- are there some corner cases for people not using Maildir?\r
+- isn't there some information encoded in whether a message is in cur or\r
+ new? there was some discussion of mutt presenting this information\r
+\r
+d\r