Re: [PATCH 2/3] emacs: Don't return the button from `notmuch-show-insert-part-header'.

diff --git a/d1/621899ce07d911581ca629a9845a3b72726399 b/d1/621899ce07d911581ca629a9845a3b72726399
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e34787a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/d1/621899ce07d911581ca629a9845a3b72726399
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E57429E5B\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:12:22 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id nB2uVZV0pvLA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:12:21 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.41])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 7069C429E54   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:12:21 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so2589677wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:12:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.100.234 with SMTP id fb10mr12913929wib.5.1327309940293;\r
+       Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:12:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q7sm11759931wix.5.2012.01.23.01.12.18\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:12:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id DF7DCA0950; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:12:16 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] emacs: Don't return the button from\r
+       `notmuch-show-insert-part-header'.\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ipk22439.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1327052612-1040-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1327052612-1040-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <877h0jmn9a.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <cun8vky6dh8.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87ipk22439.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+73~gd51b784 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:12:13 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cun39b66avm.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:12:22 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:52:26 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=\r
+ucture.net> wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:16:03 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> > There was no problem with the logic. The code in the two functions was\r
+> > almost identical, so I'd like to make any future changes in just one\r
+> > place.\r
+> >\r
+> > You didn't actually answer my question - is the logic in the new\r
+> > function correct?\r
+>=20\r
+> Honestly I didn't look too closely yet since I'm not convinced we need\r
+> the change at all.  I would prefer to keep the functions separate.  In\r
+> my opinion, enough special casing would be required that it wouldn't be\r
+> worth it, and it would make the code less clear.\r
+\r
+Okay.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk8dJG0ACgkQaezQq/BJZRbO/QCdHPWe9hYLGNb4XIGGu2JlCrMB\r
+0mIAn3fRdxmFfmYu+OH+atVFM8zJggu3\r
+=2Vi0\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r