Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Reply enhancements

diff --git a/29/6fe91f009d7e69f44cef694c6baa518cf8a73e b/29/6fe91f009d7e69f44cef694c6baa518cf8a73e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6c29db1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/29/6fe91f009d7e69f44cef694c6baa518cf8a73e
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12D7431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id vvmFtPiBzYDP for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B3F431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so4315287lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type\r
+       :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=K5JwiV58mTDQE9EpDdB5BJ6vVXrx7RlOSvf80rG5d7U=;\r
+       b=duIUgU3zkhJ+MMYzFq+/GiokBXyCpjj8Hmj0rl+HDEJcVGc6Sx/jwa+niTwxdF6JMu\r
+       8fbyAZKTwVKVH8jR6XatGZGV2TolK5Io6A5+Yg+VMgdqzMsfSfXZJuqHisXxRD/TsVwx\r
+       j7iESy7io3HA/z1ipWTnKRtMBpjN/hyjWYa2B2D0bMuMgHoqqTOaUdCNDxhGoJiO2xFS\r
+       nZFDmknPQQSUtoWrAf6WqwD2qZgHJx/ZgoeV6K16VMKHthmPxQrWzUVcWig/2oLpOxtf\r
+       Q8yE7VI9SHZviJoUippdOnMITx85o174JZcrAWQy7LBHvyL7f044NRKxzAU/TcUP00aI\r
+       sA3Q==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.112.99.7 with SMTP id em7mr2494345lbb.81.1332012790410; Sat,\r
+       17 Mar 2012 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: awg@xvx.ca\r
+Received: by 10.112.20.163 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]\r
+In-Reply-To: <8762e3dosb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1331525142-30539-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+       <8762e3dosb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:33:10 -0600\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: shy31AXdEzM_gV88ZxiYYY0k-s4\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMoJFUs1PCS1adiB-H2=H0oCsk-c8-_5Oagqc27_TgnUH-cVBw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Reply enhancements\r
+From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQmRI22A2M5fTgypqDwV46Epf7CD0tNNk65pZ6yD+wo9P0BclhR0SQgODTgGR0eyCnVOVcMr\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:33:15 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 13:13, Jameson Graef Rollins\r
+<jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> The test suite actually includes a test for replying to encrypted\r
+> messages (see crypto: "reply to encrypted message"). =A0That test should\r
+> run as long as gnupg is available on the test system, and if it passes\r
+> you should be good to go.\r
+>\r
+> But in any event I have tested this patch set, including the decryption\r
+> option, and it all looks good to me.\r
+\r
+Thanks for testing.\r
+\r
+The crypto test suite has never worked for me, even though I have\r
+gnupg installed. I assume it's some sort of configuration issue on my\r
+system, but I haven't been able to figure out what it is.\r