Re: encrypting replies to encrypted mail

diff --git a/ae/179aa519e6b12706c14c9b011c12b80ccb89b0 b/ae/179aa519e6b12706c14c9b011c12b80ccb89b0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..32ce085
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ae/179aa519e6b12706c14c9b011c12b80ccb89b0
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBE1429E35\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id TK3Q+Rq4hZjd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A657D429E2F\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D07766E00D0;\r
+       Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (wsip-98-175-145-180.no.no.cox.net\r
+       [98.175.145.180]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB6E30B0003;\r
+       Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 26E47600A3; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: =?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds <fauno@kiwwwi.com.ar>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: encrypting replies to encrypted mail\r
+In-Reply-To: <87zjn155ra.fsf@endefensadelsl.org>\r
+References: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87zjn155ra.fsf@endefensadelsl.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+9~g39408d0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:04 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <8761ppc5ov.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:21:42 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Sun, Jan 12 2014, Nicol=C3=A1s Reynolds <fauno@kiwwwi.com.ar> wrote:\r
+> Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> Hi, folks.  I've been worried for a while about the fact that my notmuch\r
+>> mua (notmuch-emacs) does not automatically encrypt replies to encrypted\r
+>> messages.  Recently my fears came true when I accidentally sent in the\r
+>> clear a reply to an encrypted message that include a full quote of the\r
+>> original encrypted text.  This is obviously not ok, to the extent that I\r
+>> would like to now consider this a UI bug in notmuch-emacs.\r
+>\r
+> i solved this by using jl-encrypt.el that asks me if i want to encrypt\r
+> an email if the identities i'm writing to are on my keyring :)\r
+\r
+This is certainly a reasonable approach, and is in fact what is outlined\r
+in the "Default Encrypt" link I provided.  However, I still feel it\r
+would be good to automatically encrypt replies to encrypted messages by\r
+default, without needing to prompt the user.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS0vkwAAoJEO00zqvie6q80wcP/11jxFXFOshaN6ZWH32pNvJx\r
+9nv5/WdIG15UMM2K3CAWZnFZMmuEpToxE1E1OCygOg6U6ScMHeHrgn0v+s6Cr6aW\r
+LNnv59i8PgjGU8K1H+lo7IyBxLdyPakXZceDJ06dPe/TWi7+RX0dXSjLeTa/a6lM\r
+TkOFX80n0tfam0muufAcquTQkX0c/DpHEUk/I5NvPUmdyYseI0lXymRZtf69UvGK\r
+oylC4IoD8ZxPjrXWiyyrBKHvPTSU//t73u7MqgpjMDQyFe5ML3AWYGfmWmaFmAfa\r
+TOXDAqhVP1EFVPshtydJuxJVLL8wU9Bq+qXGpgf4xtQsaD5RQPUR/yM3heEJeXYC\r
+puhD8kOAMGcAaS3EpHVptvAQrp69AN7GVc4N7NG3kfs38iiTYWrZYhKY+zgeYLQ5\r
+Oxcb+KuYehGrNgGpAVsmhkFFKgKPcxQ9CcZMeDWqFzr1AsvGCpq1LMPRqsnvwfYg\r
+eGODDP88SkLkOy12ppPq30wuRI9cc4JTGjAtExB+o+d0ztxKmkpdbRBgIiIeI/sw\r
+Tzfgc4pw6kHv7HOt92UeUt/V3nluJgjUd7Ib4YU45WA89AFNqdZgXTECAy9GYY2Z\r
+oNr62IM40iMGE3sYxuHNoLbI1o93vavSUl+7hOt1C30n9SiQSWUDdBoC59JreHzQ\r
+JSPBCuUh3js8tuh7CT8a\r
+=dfU4\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r