Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] emacs: Prefer '[No Subject]' to blank subjects.

diff --git a/fc/49b89e06d2ffd60c8d36b03b788cfaf3199976 b/fc/49b89e06d2ffd60c8d36b03b788cfaf3199976
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f58fa33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fc/49b89e06d2ffd60c8d36b03b788cfaf3199976
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C74D431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  5 Feb 2012 23:07:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id kdvf0it6215y for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun,  5 Feb 2012 23:07:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA93431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  5 Feb 2012 23:07:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BF366E0108;\r
+       Sun,  5 Feb 2012 23:07:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FAB66E00CB;\r
+       Sun,  5 Feb 2012 23:07:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id C29C44CC; Sun,  5 Feb 2012 23:07:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] emacs: Prefer '[No Subject]' to blank subjects.\r
+In-Reply-To: <1327918561-16245-3-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+References: <1327496913-4946-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1327918561-16245-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1327918561-16245-3-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+156~gde94716 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:07:02 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87sjiobfu1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:07:14 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+Sorry to be so late on this, but I'm not a big fan of this new feature.\r
+I would prefer to always see the subject (or any other field for that\r
+matter) as is.\r
+\r
+As a principle I would prefer there not be text replacements unless it's\r
+very clear that text has been replaced.  Buttons work because it's clear\r
+they're buttons.  This is not the case here, though, since this text\r
+replacement could actually be confused with real text.\r
+\r
+It's also not clear to me why this feature would be needed.  I have\r
+never found blank subjects confusing.  The field is always clearly\r
+delineated, at least in search and show mode.  If it's not clear\r
+elsewhere, maybe we can make the delineation of the subject field\r
+clearer, but leave the actual subject text string alone.\r
+\r
+If some feel this feature is really needed we should at least have a\r
+customization variable.  notmuch-unblank-subject?  I don't have any good\r
+name suggestions, though.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPL3wWAAoJEO00zqvie6q848YQAKzWCqGKnm7nScNTZhO9qn8o\r
+bSwqm3aXcxqR6Z8kS9J0A92L3AjU0xkhPGMGska32Ni6P0BcaYXZjFLV6JA+g8Zx\r
+Z30BDiKYfZ29k0Q8rNQmg8jQpjEUiXpA+w1pSZ5PDY7ZZK9Px5Ao/8HD18l9/Ina\r
+mBI9tSjHEaLKSn/ydX82VZHPEDkpGJwzgewRikxxvLYgrYV87sCb6nj4BuNXzo0d\r
+XSQcfPiHnIZICjjzm4VSS+jvQDNXtoC8R58s6xjAA1wFrt56C4hGnGqd1OiG1qs3\r
+KlouPN3ZPMC2aHEu5IG3tl7cW3XdUikgCi7+dO8LjUgfsjj7mlCriyeIYmbQ6cZD\r
+gqcuFBTFPzpihS7+H6CZaNItyV8vGu3+eFQ6oKtDdMdu/Ct63n1rPeRyndJf3ekg\r
+bVpcVqoEWJ69d2mXU8al6H7BoERTNAT7Eig8boYJ9sk30fMZltICtUDEkyt/DZbc\r
+LHmE7lqQN/M0umRsxYdJ8VOZ/hMOoJRdhUY1XKX8MA1lpevAwiOZQ06J1dafxdPj\r
+KjT9wvtAOhbIRiUhmHiGdG56Q2nMNAYbJqy6Om5yLQaCwz5Ne+1n+f4opvlCrpIL\r
+spOcrpQSHpR2YwsD8MGtjctrad2VJIUA5Aw0zmlLrl8Z9uwEdO9qeWTh1lLTPaOx\r
+yR8BURHJHCPn3SYMV6Ze\r
+=xYtn\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r