Re: search summary and exclusions

diff --git a/97/73a2c4e5592a80310e0305b60cddc8600d96a9 b/97/73a2c4e5592a80310e0305b60cddc8600d96a9
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..218dd97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/97/73a2c4e5592a80310e0305b60cddc8600d96a9
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99449431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.099\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id JW8CCNToFGZN for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00006431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by dadg9 with SMTP id g9so7012926dad.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version\r
+       :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;\r
+       bh=257Ygue83o/MyU52CkgsYPFT8/KLI/Sz1JgArcX+e1s=;\r
+       b=vxONlc53L/at9DCYWpmEs/2+7whtlmRySo2BJPNntxR3EoDFLuMX7SHHE+8TwYHf1V\r
+       GGtEcrqA7tCuJjqxZlqsv3hGt38Y1lx7ft2P+THdNAwU48PcdNkuh+EXwIj/YHDc2I2t\r
+       3a91oQ2r/1yOaZwv5OfE7TRfffJAW4fUdWUvub42hXoAwILP43Jmy5QZ2/CDM2fMV3DJ\r
+       UnqWII6E9nrxa2A0eL+kxuBhDFHwodsylFhca2TQl7ioemhJcKhjbsJyB/qpOGITiJ8R\r
+       8LXtx+TTjTWpKE52UEvLb6RWGqOOzYH1lhGCLmqrwcY9orqGNzxs6vdK9IdUvVUDjJW2\r
+       mDig==\r
+Received: by 10.68.232.161 with SMTP id tp1mr38194816pbc.44.1339916612975;\r
+       Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
+       [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id\r
+       gh10sm19381850pbc.19.2012.06.17.00.03.28\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:03:25 +1000\r
+Message-ID: <20120617170325.GA18059@hili.localdomain>\r
+From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: search summary and exclusions\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vgam7lg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <87mx4sp79z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120529140107.GE2347@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <87fwajnibz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120530130733.GC2332@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <878vgam7lg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 07:03:42 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:49:31 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> \r
+> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> >\r
+> > Maybe there is room for another keyword under --exclude?\r
+> \r
+> Yes that might be the best way to go. Something like --exclude=all and\r
+> then excluded messages never appear anywhere?\r
+> \r
+> I think it should be easy: I will try to send a patch tonight.\r
+\r
+Hi Mark,\r
+\r
+Did you get a chance to try this?  Otherwise I can have a look.\r
+\r
+Peter\r