Re: emacs compatibility?

diff --git a/93/43bc7067a71834b4a88681842934738a4b0025 b/93/43bc7067a71834b4a88681842934738a4b0025
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d272dca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/93/43bc7067a71834b4a88681842934738a4b0025
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217B4431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id MTawZ5lvNrRB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9C4431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1VlIaW-0008WC-JS; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:22:00 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 1765 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 26 Nov 2013\r
+       13:21:56 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, notmuch mailing list\r
+       <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: emacs compatibility?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87eh649npl.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <87eh649npl.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17~rc1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:21:56 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87r4a35mdn.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:22:09 -0000\r
+\r
+Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> i notice that in the current master, debian/notmuch-emacs.README.Debian\r
+> contains the following stanza:\r
+>\r
+> ------------\r
+> * This package currently works only with emacs 23.  Users of \r
+>   pre-release snapshots of emacs 24 can expect problems.\r
+> ------------\r
+>\r
+> I'm using notmuch (and notmuch-emacs) 0.16 with emacs24, and i don't\r
+> think i'm seeing any such problems.  But maybe i'm just lucky and/or\r
+> conservative and don't happen to tickle any of the incompatibilities?\r
+>\r
+> Or is the above README (which is dated from 2011) stale?  If so, as a\r
+> user i'd appreciate an update that reflect the current expectations of\r
+> the notmuch development community about which versions of emacs are\r
+> considered well-supported for the upcoming 0.17 release.\r
+\r
+Yeah, emacs24 is fine with 0.17~pre-whatever.  Someone(TM) should update\r
+that README.\r
+\r
+d\r