Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery
authorDavid Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:46:59 +0000 (15:46 +2100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:47:33 +0000 (09:47 -0800)
e7/40427a161e7f0acbf9962ed8ddb5c4250f0c9c [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/e7/40427a161e7f0acbf9962ed8ddb5c4250f0c9c b/e7/40427a161e7f0acbf9962ed8ddb5c4250f0c9c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..47bcfd7
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1429431FC4\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id cYzD-sdb4XFd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC46431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1SaWsK-0006g8-KE; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:47:04 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1SaWsF-0003ea-9d; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:46:59 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,\r
+       "Justus Winter" <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>\r
+Subject: Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery\r
+In-Reply-To: <87mx4mvqch.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <20120531214259.GA18272@desktop>\r
+       <m2pq9jo7jf.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+       <CAMP44s0vvEDLd2DceFraNpqyMrX2A+=zkV6W=ABatZs52FNo5Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87lik7171d.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <87sjefufub.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <874nqu28y1.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <87mx4mvqch.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:46:59 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87sjeezx7g.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: Ali Polatel <alip@exherbo.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:47:13 -0000\r
+\r
+Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> I think the zeroth-order thing we have to do then is to have the build\r
+> include the bindings as well.  Then everyone will be able to see\r
+> immediately if the bindings are broken.  I wouldn't even make it an\r
+> option, or make it an option to exclude building the bindings rather\r
+> than to include.\r
+\r
+OK, I can agree with this. Can we get some help from the bindings\r
+maintainers (or other interested people) in getting this working? \r
+Probably configure should detect/decide what bindings to build.\r
+\r
+d\r