Clean up reporting differences on branch switch
authorDaniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:52:14 +0000 (02:52 -0500)
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:25:52 +0000 (00:25 -0800)
This also changes it such that:

$ git checkout

will give the same information without changing branches. This is good
for finding out if the fetch you did recently had anything to say
about the branch you've been on, whose name you don't remember at the
moment.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-checkout.c

index 0d19835a6b9e8d52574531c0453eff91f47b8e8d..5291f72a370729d72bb990a3cd7db1c2672ca37d 100644 (file)
@@ -291,71 +291,6 @@ static int merge_working_tree(struct checkout_opts *opts,
        return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * We really should allow cb_data... Yuck
- */
-static const char *branch_name;
-static int branch_name_len;
-static char *found_remote;
-static char *found_merge;
-static int read_branch_config(const char *var, const char *value)
-{
-       const char *name;
-       if (prefixcmp(var, "branch."))
-               return 0; /* not ours */
-       name = var + strlen("branch.");
-       if (strncmp(name, branch_name, branch_name_len) ||
-           name[branch_name_len] != '.')
-               return 0; /* not ours either */
-       if (!strcmp(name + branch_name_len, ".remote")) {
-               /*
-                * Yeah, I know Christian's clean-up should
-                * be used here, but the topic is based on an
-                * older fork point.
-                */
-               if (!value)
-                       return error("'%s' not string", var);
-               found_remote = xstrdup(value);
-               return 0;
-       }
-       if (!strcmp(name + branch_name_len, ".merge")) {
-               if (!value)
-                       return error("'%s' not string", var);
-               found_merge = xstrdup(value);
-               return 0;
-       }
-       return 0; /* not ours */
-}
-
-static int find_build_base(const char *ours, char **base)
-{
-       struct remote *remote;
-       struct refspec spec;
-
-       *base = NULL;
-
-       branch_name = ours + strlen("refs/heads/");
-       branch_name_len = strlen(branch_name);
-       found_remote = NULL;
-       found_merge = NULL;
-       git_config(read_branch_config);
-
-       if (!found_remote || !found_merge) {
-       cleanup:
-               free(found_remote);
-               free(found_merge);
-               return 0;
-       }
-
-       remote = remote_get(found_remote);
-       memset(&spec, 0, sizeof(spec));
-       spec.src = found_merge;
-       if (remote_find_tracking(remote, &spec))
-               goto cleanup;
-       *base = spec.dst;
-       return 1;
-}
-
 static void adjust_to_tracking(struct branch_info *new, struct checkout_opts *opts)
 {
        /*
@@ -369,15 +304,16 @@ static void adjust_to_tracking(struct branch_info *new, struct checkout_opts *op
        const char *msgfmt;
        char symmetric[84];
        int show_log;
+       struct branch *branch = branch_get(NULL);
 
-       if (!resolve_ref(new->path, sha1, 1, NULL))
+       if (!branch || !branch->merge)
                return;
-       ours = lookup_commit(sha1);
 
-       if (!find_build_base(new->path, &base))
-               return;
+       base = branch->merge[0]->dst;
+
+       ours = new->commit;
 
-       sprintf(symmetric, "%s", sha1_to_hex(sha1));
+       sprintf(symmetric, "%s", sha1_to_hex(ours->object.sha1));
 
        /*
         * Ok, it is tracking base; is it ahead of us?
@@ -466,7 +402,7 @@ static void update_refs_for_switch(struct checkout_opts *opts,
        }
        remove_branch_state();
        strbuf_release(&msg);
-       if (new->path)
+       if (new->path || !strcmp(new->name, "HEAD"))
                adjust_to_tracking(new, opts);
 }