Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

diff --git a/11/7d4f57d688e5af3f0598ec1965547f81416683 b/11/7d4f57d688e5af3f0598ec1965547f81416683
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..799fc5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/11/7d4f57d688e5af3f0598ec1965547f81416683
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Return-Path: <rlb@defaultvalue.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C96431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:40 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ppkLePqdTFYU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:39 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from defaultvalue.org (defaultvalue.org [70.85.129.156])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E9D431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:39 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A400B90D35;\r
+       Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:17:06 -0600 (CST)\r
+Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7])\r
+       by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665895010C;\r
+       Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600 (CST)\r
+Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 57ED37BA375; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600 (CST)\r
+From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>\r
+To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support\r
+References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <87d3mdvjwz.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info> <87k4gk70ng.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <87sjv8i7v6.fsf@irigaray.ross.mayfirst.org>\r
+       <87sjv86mp9.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <4D6BF0AA.3070706@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <874o7o6ih5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <4D6C00C7.9000705@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <8739n75zdb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600\r
+In-Reply-To: <8739n75zdb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> (Jameson Rollins's\r
+       message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:19 -0800")\r
+Message-ID: <87hbbno7ia.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>\r
+User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:16:40 -0000\r
+\r
+Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't\r
+> themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm\r
+> inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name.\r
+\r
+Are persistent tags required here?  The original question at least,\r
+seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has\r
+encrypted or signed bits.  So I wondered if that might be accomplished\r
+without actual tags.\r
+\r
+Just curious.\r
+-- \r
+Rob Browning\r
+rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org\r
+GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4\r