Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if COND (progn ..." with "(when...

diff --git a/db/8665e836e85a8ef4788c307f986febd6d0cf4e b/db/8665e836e85a8ef4788c307f986febd6d0cf4e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e9dc319
--- /dev/null
+++ b/db/8665e836e85a8ef4788c307f986febd6d0cf4e
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AF4431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id V8R8DhrAM4QK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEDFE431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by dadv6 with SMTP id v6so2865465dad.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:23 -0800 (PST)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.68.115.174 with SMTP id jp14mr23046424pbb.42.1327755322955;\r
+       Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:22 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.68.236.137 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:22 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.68.236.137 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:22 -0800 (PST)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87y5ssxam7.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87k44uprvy.fsf@praet.org>\r
+       <1326532638-22068-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
+       <87y5ssxam7.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAB+hUn-GmONr24nfxBkt59TzHHyZiD1wioYXoPh9wy-rZR-m2g@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if COND (progn\r
+       ..." with "(when ..."\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b1120d15f97cb04b7962004\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:55:25 -0000\r
+\r
+--047d7b1120d15f97cb04b7962004\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David Bremner" <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+>\r
+> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.\r
+> >\r
+>\r
+> This looks OK, although the re-indenting makes these kind of changes\r
+> painful to review (not that I'm suggesting we should re-indent, just\r
+> some random complaining).\r
+\r
+Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that separated a small functional\r
+change, and the big non-functional indentation change it caused,\r
+separately. Would you prefer (or tolerate ;) that style?\r
+\r
+>\r
+> d\r
+>\r
+>\r
+\r
+--047d7b1120d15f97cb04b7962004\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+<p><br>\r
+On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, &quot;David Bremner&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:david@tethera.net">david@tethera.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br>\r
+&gt;<br>\r
+&gt; On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet &lt;<a href="mailto:pieter@praet.org">pieter@praet.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>\r
+&gt; &gt; Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.<br>\r
+&gt; &gt;<br>\r
+&gt;<br>\r
+&gt; This looks OK, although the re-indenting makes these kind of changes<br>\r
+&gt; painful to review (not that I&#39;m suggesting we should re-indent, just<br>\r
+&gt; some random complaining).</p>\r
+<p>Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that separated a small functional change, and the big non-functional indentation change it caused, separately. Would you prefer (or tolerate ;) that style?<br></p>\r
+<p>&gt;<br>\r
+&gt; d<br>\r
+&gt;<br>\r
+&gt;<br>\r
+</p>\r
+\r
+--047d7b1120d15f97cb04b7962004--\r