--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DD9431FC2\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id hIF7DvnRZdJm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:26:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com\r
+ [209.85.219.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11303431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:26:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m17so5525081oag.7\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:26:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version\r
+ :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;\r
+ bh=DVDAovIfM0m+cp0ml1dQcg5njtbuIJW5dX6HQZ9aN2A=;\r
+ b=pQrojb+a4zdD8jnjXYKsv4ivt552avqOWBXIPDTmghEOZGineCGAR9UnVc5RbMi3BI\r
+ TS6HZErR6mr9F3P9/kMSIkGEohLBz8GA8TrvJPIUm1ZOxbYpoM/TWpc6e3u2ULLCn6Rc\r
+ pHXFv74oiZXU8rZSnMRFjDDSanAl4LoT2MG/YYhFNGN2rRn+xAM/xhkehg8IudEmVNM/\r
+ H0588qXg0UVTr3jGsURStatRgogwN9DW+PH+2gwgbx20hK5e2WGYr2FrjD5mOcrjNhMD\r
+ 7QOE3VnMBM8kf67nn6ALLnRxH++pcGGZYc4N4ntzV9jXbIrEP1MXS+M82cYS39joTQgg\r
+ +NzQ==\r
+X-Received: by 10.60.157.2 with SMTP id wi2mr6189095oeb.35.1383395168567;\r
+ Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:26:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (187-162-140-241.static.axtel.net. [187.162.140.241])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id\r
+ nw5sm19547576obc.9.2013.11.02.05.26.07 for <multiple recipients>\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:26:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 06:17:17 -0600\r
+From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, \r
+ Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Message-ID: <5274ed4d5126a_46fcefbe747f@nysa.notmuch>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87txgpv16s.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1380558523-6913-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+ <87txgpv16s.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] General fixes\r
+Mime-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain;\r
+ charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:26:15 -0000\r
+\r
+David Bremner wrote:\r
+> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:\r
+> \r
+> > Felipe Contreras (3):\r
+> > query: bind queries to database objects\r
+> > ruby: allow build with RUNPATH\r
+> > ruby: bind database close()/destroy() properly\r
+> \r
+> I agree with the discussion on IRC that the change in the first patch\r
+> makes sense.\r
+\r
+Shall I push it to the master branch then?\r
+\r
+> It would be nice to have a bit more explanation in the commit message of\r
+> the second message; at least to point out that (iiuc) this is not a\r
+> really a ruby specific thing, just a standard ld.so feature.\r
+\r
+I don't really care that much about patch #2, but #3 should probably be\r
+applied.\r
+\r
+The important is #1 though.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Felipe Contreras\r