Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive

diff --git a/9f/b4caf5494a2a74306c712f56e6f377acb6f555 b/9f/b4caf5494a2a74306c712f56e6f377acb6f555
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a4675e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9f/b4caf5494a2a74306c712f56e6f377acb6f555
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E824196F0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2010 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -3.42\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77,\r
+       T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id fMlFpfYZoiYo for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  9 Jun 2010 08:55:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AE1431FC1\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2010 08:55:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (NYUFGA-GUESTS-01.NATPOOL.NYU.EDU\r
+       [192.76.177.124])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o59FtqYZ017927\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:55:52 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1OMNdA-0000g7-0b; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:55:52 -0400\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive\r
+In-Reply-To: <87wru8rze2.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <87zkz4xnf4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <874ohctf2h.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87sk4wxm7j.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87wru8rze2.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-59-g0b3b2bd (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:55:49 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87hblcxksa.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:56:04 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:36:53 +0100, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> They are clearly different. If I read a thread with 'space' the 'unread'\r
+> tag is removed from the messages as I pass them by. I can then 'q' from\r
+> the thread and the messages are not archived ('inbox' is not removed),\r
+> but they are no longer 'unread'.\r
+\r
+But it's not necessarily clear that you've reached the end of a thread,\r
+which means it's somewhat indeterministic if the "inbox" tag is removed\r
+or not.  If users have to explicitly remove all tags other than\r
+"unread", then this gets rid of this problem all together.\r
+\r
+> Maybe you could submit a patch which allows a user to choose the\r
+> behaviour with a customisation variable? (Though I'd expect the value of\r
+> that variable to preserve backward compatible behaviour until Carl says\r
+> otherwise.)\r
+\r
+I actually submitted this patch because there was noise on #notmuch\r
+about people (including from cworth) not liking the default behavior\r
+where the "inbox" tag is removed by the advance function.\r
+\r
+I would like to push it back the other way.  Having specific tags\r
+modified by specific commands is something particular to individual\r
+users.  If a user wants to do something special, they can make their own\r
+function to do that.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMD7mFAAoJEO00zqvie6q8qNgQAI9sbCStoUtvgsdnrHXq8ymJ\r
+OyNh/5nCJKjwSSvOVDoMaeXOZyXyzMsuM+d5P++Kk7NGqkFUt3LGij6ZkOn1nQbA\r
+ehlkuZHM+hbOt6kne4dpqWAmLDAzI1jUB1RhhGuP9HRuWB0zZvZMxiHbhXeGXFz0\r
+osw4kXf3M1GwV3xTULZ9F22os1a8vJMBa3igzaxhg0cQ3fVyEcAxQtIlNrzoskjm\r
+1l9xNKJzVP3c8Eb06K5BX1OVmYrOgr//hN/vg3HbZ3lF13+UBet5J/F5JNQGXNz4\r
+C3ohPdgvOGaaLYR0INEjaLjxN8D/lYPkgZM4vBJPpjProgzmQFoGWgF82WD1aWvm\r
+ZbiOfOQd5QO/oZdzwxdvszDo6JmYtKA55m/TunlXcbd+Yt9Qh5RCLZZtYAXo23GY\r
+IKNOykxILAa7D00KrNOrffVSrEZi9tMy2mrp/mHzRTaElUWW2qLeN90NmZ3uAVu2\r
+nCNAJ5JMcRuU04fLNcyd9Um1xsxie9SVElOfmj5q9atDWCSpjKibxNKuQCxIiZjR\r
+IvClD3qGO8hcoG5NiD7H+c7lInnSmGHDpUTE37y3Jv2AluiLn/iyPjYL+NLX+nWt\r
+hvQ+oMAWu6yopxnTtr81eOB3jX8IDahEZg44qv5tBbE5taMAIyRS+BhEqNPvcVAh\r
+XV/QnwLe/tSesgjp/ZOM\r
+=TnhJ\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r