Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs

diff --git a/4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f b/4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b8b63b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECF6431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 4EiGc2CaktAq for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FA6431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SkVBb-0001ML-7X; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:16 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SkVBa-0003jE-Sf; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:11 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAOJ+Ob1bsbU2uj2F_7CZFY2t2Pu78whNETHTYfZVKPEaymGw8Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <1340656899-5644-1-git-send-email-ethan@betacantrips.com>\r
+       <87bok3m70p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <CAOJ+Ob1bsbU2uj2F_7CZFY2t2Pu78whNETHTYfZVKPEaymGw8Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+51~gf947b9b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:05 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87a9zmr4ay.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: fdc0a9b93538119189081300f67c49fe (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:00:21 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>wrote:\r
+>\r
+>>\r
+>> Just a quick question: does this update the database with\r
+>> maildir://files URIs instead of just filenames? In other words is it\r
+>> safe to try out on actual mailstores?\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> It doesn't change any of the existing filenames or do anything like a\r
+> database "upgrade". If you run notmuch new, it should add a URI-based\r
+> filename to each message, but I don't think it should remove old filenames,\r
+> so I would expect it to be fine. But I didn't expect anyone to try it on\r
+> their actual mail database.\r
+\r
+The breakage I observed was when trying to reply to a message after\r
+reverting to master: on the command line I got\r
+\r
+Error opening /database_path/maildir:///full_path_of_file: No such file or directory\r
+\r
+When doing notmuch search output=files I see both possibilities.\r
+\r
+Surprisingly notmuch new does not seem to remove these entries.\r
+\r
+>> (I used it on a trial system but when I reverted to master some things\r
+>> seemed to stop working)\r
+>\r
+> Sorry for breaking it :)\r
+\r
+It was no problem for me: it was just a test corpus of 10,000 message\r
+that I use for testing.\r
+\r
+In case anyone else has problems the following solved it for me:\r
+\r
+1) dump the tags\r
+2) delete the .notmuch subdirectory of the mail store \r
+3) run notmuch new\r
+4) restore the tags\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r