Re: Concerns regarding some library functions
authorTomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:40:31 +0000 (16:40 +0300)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:39:35 +0000 (09:39 -0800)
a5/03c9bf412c6dddd95d2f3654639b2ffee960c1 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/a5/03c9bf412c6dddd95d2f3654639b2ffee960c1 b/a5/03c9bf412c6dddd95d2f3654639b2ffee960c1
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a492f91
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EC8429E27\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  4 Oct 2011 06:40:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id UU8UUewGeRbz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  4 Oct 2011 06:40:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9980D429E25\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  4 Oct 2011 06:40:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id\r
+       p94DeVIH004160\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:40:31 +0300\r
+Received: (from too@localhost)\r
+       by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p94DeVIZ004159;\r
+       Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:40:31 +0300\r
+X-Authentication-Warning: taco2.nixu.fi: too set sender to\r
+       tomi.ollila@nixu.com using -f\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: Concerns regarding some library functions\r
+References: <871uv2unfd.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwjhx6p5.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <20110927224622.GR17905@mit.edu> <877h4tyug1.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+       <20110929145129.GB17905@mit.edu> <8762kbqfvv.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <20110929201536.GF17905@mit.edu> <87sjn9knsy.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:40:31 +0300\r
+In-Reply-To: <87sjn9knsy.fsf@zancas.localnet> (David Bremner's message of\r
+       "Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:18:21 -0300")\r
+Message-ID: <yf6sjn8j2nk.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:40:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue 04 Oct 2011 14:18, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+>\r
+> So I've pushed the ABI changes, making it more urgent to do something\r
+> about this.  At this point I'm inclined to bump the soname in order to\r
+> unbreak things, unless someone wants to come up with a convincing set of\r
+> patches to do the symbol versioning.\r
+\r
+Can symbol versioning be done with 'C' symbols ?\r
+\r
+>\r
+> d\r
+\r
+Tomi\r