--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336D5431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 May 2013 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id a0Ul-8idye3n for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 5 May 2013 05:45:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com\r
+ [209.85.217.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DFD8431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 May 2013 05:45:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id t11so2707636lbd.15\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 05 May 2013 05:45:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=x-received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+ bh=3sfUfXwj/Cas7j6AHrHKmem6Q7hZ8momnks11TP5kRM=;\r
+ b=RzG8gccF60uNVYN8plC8y2cCdAx6L/g3cAoJ2FbWjjtx+PbI49ZSNkZAbmkWNIK7sW\r
+ KSnFwAl/jMD+/yIxTJR+I8LpbEkSCHOiz5+pvG6UpJsr6oYfE+FXCr0RlVXHLDevOG7s\r
+ HyMHXzig/xXY6kwaCU+cKw3+ggi1CttKUeCe89rEF50df3SH+ApLVRGnk+TniNz834As\r
+ C5E7qVAHSlH0nel7dgpkmu4AB+hvrNXbXmw3wQ1kg3GMvrIVluF29FOcoujtXpsFxt3P\r
+ ElgqUBDitYxZEg3OWkq54YzYNDCPdOCCOxq4QnVLQwR9POWo5rd5FeYUylRdW1XVJq04\r
+ AyWg==\r
+X-Received: by 10.112.144.36 with SMTP id sj4mr6735405lbb.1.1367757941361;\r
+ Sun, 05 May 2013 05:45:41 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c376-211.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+ [88.195.118.211])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm5364689lbv.14.2013.05.05.05.45.39\r
+ for <multiple recipients>\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+ Sun, 05 May 2013 05:45:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>,\r
+ Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>,\r
+ notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enhancements to notmuch-hello search history\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2li7teoip.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <87y5bwkml2.fsf@goose.CSU.McMaster.CA> <874nejrupr.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+ <87ppx6lo6g.fsf@goose.CSU.McMaster.CA>\r
+ <m2li7teoip.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+87~gc69f540 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 15:45:35 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <87a9o9fvdc.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQlQNzmZpx+GzR6PZ9U1LhFYO2PvsN0ltE4W+mikj15lxR3cKNfu9eEX735C86ms+pE1ToSj\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:45:49 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, 05 May 2013, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:\r
+> I agree with Jani that y-or-n-p would suffice for clearing all\r
+> recent searches (but yes-or-no-p is not so bad as I originally thought\r
+> as C-g can be used to stop processing (typoing 'no' is too easy ;/). \r
+>\r
+> If we could use "undo" feature to restore last clear/del then I'd agree\r
+> 100% with Mark (i.e. no y-or-n-p for [del]).\r
+>\r
+> In any case fix at least the style issue Mark mentioned -- any of the\r
+> yes/no queries will eventually be fine with me (as I don't know without\r
+> experience what would be the best (for me) after all).\r
+\r
+Servilio, please switch to y-or-n-p in patch 1 and fix the style issue\r
+in patch 2, and I think we're happy on the average. :)\r
+\r
+Jani.\r