Re: [PATCH] test: copyright information updates

diff --git a/8e/51778cb98a4327ea4246a1d4f59d6024a68d0e b/8e/51778cb98a4327ea4246a1d4f59d6024a68d0e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2a0f050
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8e/51778cb98a4327ea4246a1d4f59d6024a68d0e
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2846DE02AD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  1 May 2016 17:50:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.013\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[AWL=-0.002, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id aDXyc7_M3Hbi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun,  1 May 2016 17:49:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87186DE01BE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  1 May 2016 17:49:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)\r
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+ id 1ax23Z-00070d-9J; Sun, 01 May 2016 20:49:49 -0400\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 19583 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+ Mon, 02 May 2016 00:49:51 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Cc: tomi.ollila@iki.fi\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: copyright information updates\r
+In-Reply-To: <1460736374-10238-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+References: <1460736374-10238-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 21:49:51 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87y47t707k.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 00:50:03 -0000\r
+\r
+Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:\r
+\r
+>  # Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano\r
+> +# Copyright (c) 2010-today Notmuch Developers\r
+\r
+I don't what to think about this. The convention I am familiar with\r
+for date ranges is roughly that documented here:\r
+\r
+    https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html\r
+\r
+The tl;dr is that the years or ranges document the last significant\r
+change.\r
+\r
+On the other hand, I'd say most notmuch code has the copyright date\r
+it is created, and that is never changed.\r
+\r
+So I'd say go with creation date, or some actual date ranges that we\r
+will probably forget to update.\r
+\r
+OK, I agree it's nit picky. But it's a nit picky patch ;).\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r
+\r
+\r