Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if (not ..." with "(unless ..."
authorDavid Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:55:01 +0000 (11:55 +0000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:42:11 +0000 (09:42 -0800)
86/b6c1823d5182de2a326d46bd31ad5bc86aaf04 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/86/b6c1823d5182de2a326d46bd31ad5bc86aaf04 b/86/b6c1823d5182de2a326d46bd31ad5bc86aaf04
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d03e221
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CE0431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:55:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id xLdQgdZKBvug for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:55:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA34B431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:55:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by wibhr12 with SMTP id hr12so1658516wib.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:55:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.20.69 with SMTP id l5mr7702599wie.19.1326628504549;\r
+       Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:55:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ee6sm27471571wib.4.2012.01.15.03.55.02\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:55:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id 5433B9FEF2; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:55:01 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if (not ..." with\r
+       "(unless ..."\r
+In-Reply-To: <87hazyprpl.fsf@praet.org>\r
+References: <87vcogketu.fsf@praet.org>\r
+       <1326389586-21683-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
+       <cund3an7fk6.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <87hazyprpl.fsf@praet.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+186~gd0f7804 (http://notmuchmail.org)\r
+       Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:55:01 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cuny5t95gfe.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:55:06 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:18:46 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> Does this really warrant a v2, or might we simply leave it as yet\r
+> another victim for Tomi's uncrustify-for-elisp [1] ?\r
+\r
+Pushing incorrectly indented code should be banned, in my opinion[1]. I'd\r
+be tempted to have some pre-commit hooks to detect it.\r
+\r
+Footnotes:=20\r
+[1]  Though I've done it myself.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk8SvpUACgkQaezQq/BJZRYUzwCff7vYP1rbuFT3PBzyQNZs8o8N\r
+lEIAn1XTDuc/cAOZLmAcaQY1R+fvR3mj\r
+=2dRs\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r