Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery

diff --git a/41/f0ecdef2be9211af6ecd393c2128833d00b61c b/41/f0ecdef2be9211af6ecd393c2128833d00b61c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a9c2e55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/41/f0ecdef2be9211af6ecd393c2128833d00b61c
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528B6431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id RsCY703Pc0e5 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA22A431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CCE328025;\r
+       Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (DHCP-123-229.caltech.edu [131.215.123.229])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC02B2E50DE1;\r
+       Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:28:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 7A31614F; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:28:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+       Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,\r
+       Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+Subject: Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery\r
+In-Reply-To: <874nqu28y1.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <20120531214259.GA18272@desktop>\r
+       <m2pq9jo7jf.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+       <CAMP44s0vvEDLd2DceFraNpqyMrX2A+=zkV6W=ABatZs52FNo5Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87lik7171d.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <87sjefufub.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <874nqu28y1.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13+24~g16915cd (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:28:46 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87mx4mvqch.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: Ali Polatel <alip@exherbo.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:28:55 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Fri, Jun 01 2012, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> Ideally everything would be automated testable, but this is not the case\r
+> right now. Somebody (Jani?) mentioned on irc that having things\r
+> integrated into the toplevel build system (presumably as an optional\r
+> target) would be a start.\r
+\r
+I think the zeroth-order thing we have to do then is to have the build\r
+include the bindings as well.  Then everyone will be able to see\r
+immediately if the bindings are broken.  I wouldn't even make it an\r
+option, or make it an option to exclude building the bindings rather\r
+than to include.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPyQneAAoJEO00zqvie6q8UksP/iQ7ZS/dazchiXHgmo2ifpQ/\r
+6gTYzT7B8y3AvRpzkYgxUbMiQD22yXOC1BLQPcLQHhk6wx9dMQrbAmBP0AUGRfG3\r
+P/EOXAM6XwrUbu/mfputisL/0u6WlmLY3R0pFWrnn40Ri6BRWZqx6YClvXBLUOnJ\r
+et6D06T8aStflvGMdNSQRQWbt94L6RfK6b56gPaggExyEhAlV0qMghNwIJKhGIHf\r
+FiGY60wQnjhtBcOpHOsZQcmeY4IK/URn+IrPDCHzLX97z8q39PCIinom/ubHEyTP\r
+CMRKwCndV+1OGiZyzWvmRh145907Ahhf+CJ4d7mVClBigW5HVYYCKu2F8c2JUJVv\r
+KkfD9gI2zQdkn54MDA+UBCJHN3Lp5PWv7SxkV115aeM56G4+CoP4kv5AeWCEolxo\r
+BWo1Y8XnFa3onqNPtlwRVic8USHExIIazpd74DPGz1tKIM7qaL61WYyD4Xuqp/0f\r
+akR4KhWGbk3B86SI7ITwAAR9FUT21s/UbB/pyS+9nQHo/q2ZoK01kDoB4KQkXj+W\r
+1iN1ehl4MrwlgrNIAX5smo3p1/SrBpc4shJB65lG8D/qRzmgYbJaIAnPF1xOFeWH\r
+CvQclei+CKquVtpScIJe7ZbYOA9OShg3C2QcH8SgWqTseprTWTR1aOlWh2eSsgPV\r
+V3e7poKZbCQvzmPr1IsU\r
+=A9GK\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r