Re: Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature?

diff --git a/a9/a4e41adf9d46043cee72e8e2c8b298dbdfa171 b/a9/a4e41adf9d46043cee72e8e2c8b298dbdfa171
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..284c276
--- /dev/null
+++ b/a9/a4e41adf9d46043cee72e8e2c8b298dbdfa171
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+Return-Path: <notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918276DE0A7F\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:22:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.697\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004,\r
+  RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id dOMHrpArJfeJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:22:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 390116DE02DD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:22:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from [10.30.1.75] (unknown [67.109.75.165])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B43C22E261;\r
+ Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:22:38 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Message-ID: <55A50D1D.4020204@johnnyutahh.com>\r
+Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:22:37 -0500\r
+From: Johnny Utahh <notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com>\r
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;\r
+ rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature?\r
+References: <55A3D81E.1000302@johnnyutahh.com>\r
+ <87k2u3urce.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k2u3urce.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:22:42 -0000\r
+\r
+On 7/14/15, 2:32 AM, David Bremner wrote:\r
+> Johnny Utahh <notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature?  Details:\r
+>> https://github.com/djcb/mu/issues/22\r
+>>\r
+> Maybe new.ignore (man notmuch-config) can serve roughly the same\r
+> purpose.\r
+\r
+Thanks. Will files and directories that were previously 'notmuch new' \r
+searched and newly-assigned to new.ignore still be indexed?\r
+\r
+I understand that any email messages added after said files/directories \r
+are assigned to new.ignore will not be discovered.\r